Thanks Alok we dont want to be laughing stock of the Mycology world just because some photographers keep asking for species level id for their mom and pop photos. because our // Gargji's database going to out last us and go far and wide
enough said usha di On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 4:00 PM Isabelle & Alok <[email protected]> wrote: > True Ushadi... this has been a sore point and just to strengthen the point > (although I think enough has been said)... here's a quote by Michael Quo > > "I suppose now is not the best time to tell you that this identification > process is going to fail a lot—even, perhaps, most of the time. There are > several reasons for this, but suffice it to say that mushroom > identification is difficult, often technical, and sometimes impossible. > This is a hard nugget to swallow for those who have used field guides to > identify trees or birds, for example, and expect the mushroom world to be > equally easy to penetrate. One doesn't need a microscope to identify a > North American tree, and plenty of field guides can be found that include > more or less *all* the tree species native to the continent. With > mushrooms, one *does* need a microscope, much of the time—and no one even > knows how many thousands of mushroom species there are." > > > reference : http://mushroomexpert.com/studying.html#identifying > > > > > > On Fri, 2019-03-29 at 15:10 +0530, Ushadi Micromini wrote: > > Gargji > How can we sure of the species level ID > was a spore print done? > were spores examined microscopically? > > i am sending you a link , that shows id at species level > > > https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dr_Ab_Hamid_wani/publication/286492289_Three_hitherto_unreported_macro-fungi_from_Kashmir_Himalaya/links/5677db0908ae125516ee4375.pdf > > > In their Materials and Methods section they describe and give references > to the method > I quote: Standard method of collection, preservation, macro and > microscopic studies were followed (Kumar et al., 1990; Atri et al., 2003) > and the shape, size and colour of fresh specimen were recorded before > preservation. The spore prints were taken according to the guidelines given > by Michel Kuo (2001), then the spore morphology such as shape and size were > recorded and photographed with the aid trinocular microscope in University > Scientific Instrumentation Centre. end quote > > IT is spelled out in black and white and in simple english, there is no > scientific mumbo jumbo.... > > I would be happy if we decide as a group of citizen scientists to keep > diagnosis of Mushrooms at Genus level > and if we want to be brave we could say THIS species id is suggested by > the gross morphology only. > usha di > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 2:49 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks, Ashutosh ji, for the genus id. > To me appears close to images at *Coltricia cinnamomea* (Jacq.) Murrill > <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species--fungi/a---l/h/hymenochaetales/hymenochaetaceae/coltricia/coltricia-cinnamomea> > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 23:01 > Subject: SK1800 20 Feb 2019 - Mycophyta > To: efloraindia <[email protected]>, J.M. Garg < > [email protected]> > > > Dear Members, > > Location: Godawari, Lalitpur, Nepal > Date: 14 September 2013 > Elevation : 1475 m. > Habit : Wild > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > -- > With regards, > J.M.Garg > > 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna' > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1> > > Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia > <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia>. > > For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora, > please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group > <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> (largest in the > world- more than 2975 members & 3,00,000 messages on 25.7.18) or Efloraofindia > website <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> (with a species > database of more than 12,000 species & 3,00,000 images of which 1,00,000 > are directly displayed). > > The whole world uses my Image Resource > <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of more than a > thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. > (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as > per Creative Commons license attached with each image. > > Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of > India'. > > > -- Usha di =========== -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
