Thanks Dinesh Ji.
Regards,
Aarti

On Wednesday, May 1, 2019 at 5:45:23 PM UTC+4, Dinesh Valke wrote:
>
> I too think it must be *Bridelia retusa*.
> Regards.
> Dinesh
>
> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 7:07 PM Aarti S. Khale <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> A small tree seen in a cultivated garden in Nasik.
>> Bridelia retusa?
>> For validation please.
>> Aarti
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "efloraofindia" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
>> <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to