I too think this is T rosea and not pallida ... but will wait for other to comment before conclusion can be drawn. Tanay
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Dr.ANIL KUMAR <[email protected]>wrote: > Dear it is Tabebuia rosea not pallida > > On Jun 1, 12:58 am, Jency Samuel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > This was taken a few weeks back in Chennai. Years ago, a board nailed to > the bark of a similar tree referred to it as T. rosea. But when I googled > recently, this seemed more like T pallida. Please validate. In some places, > the trees are just about twenty feet tall. But at others, they reach more > than a 100 feet. and they are all in bloom. The tint of the flowers vary > slightly ( as I had queried earlier, but without pix) from light pink to > pale pink. > > > > Rgds > > Jency > > > > > > > > Tabebuia001.JPG > > 150KViewDownload > > > > Tabebuia002.JPG > > 160KViewDownload > > > > Tabebuia003.JPG > > 154KViewDownload > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en. > > -- Tanay Bose +91(033) 25550676 (Resi) 9830439691(Mobile) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.
