Thank you Dr. FU. I appreciate your support all the time. Saroj Kasaju
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 2:24 PM 符龙飞 <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Saroj Kasaju > > > > For SK1185, I can confirm it is E. dissectum. And I meant that your > collection is more similar to E. dissectum. I have no idea to what it > really is. It might be a new one. > > > > Best wishes > > > > Fu > > > > Guangxi Key Laboratory of Plant Conservation and Restoration Ecology in > Karst Terrain, > > Guangxi Institute of Botany, > > Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Chinese Academy of sciences > > Yanshan Street No. 85, Yanshan District > > Guilin 541006 > > P. R. China > > > > *发件人:* Saroj Kasaju [mailto:[email protected]] > *发送时间:* 2020年8月19日 星期三 16:21 > *收件人:* 符龙飞 > *抄送:* efloraindia; J.M. Garg > *主题:* Re: Re: Re: SK 2734 14 August 2020 > > > > Dear Dr. Fu, > > I am sorry to trouble you again. I feel it is slight different from my > earlier post Fwd: SK1185 08 JUNE 2018 > <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/SK1185$2008$20JUNE$202018/indiantreepix/X-WEU-rVg9o/SCuThdDcAQAJ> > . > > And, also feel some differences according to the keys from Elatostema > dissectum > <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=110&taxon_id=242319895>. > > Male inflorescences peduncle 15-80 mm and Female inflorescences peduncle > 0-1 mm which looks different in my specimen. > > I may be wrong though! > > Thank you. > > > > Saroj Kasaju > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 8:26 AM 符龙飞 <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Saroj Kasaju > > > > After checking specimen you attached, I realized it is more similar to > Elatostema dissectum. Normally, E. dissectum will have longer male peduncle > but the shortest case can be 1.5 cm. In addition, I have also gone through > Elatostema in China but could not find any other species same to your > collections. Anyway, your collection is very special and worth further > studying. > > > > Best > > > > Fu > > > > Guangxi Key Laboratory of Plant Conservation and Restoration Ecology in > Karst Terrain, > > Guangxi Institute of Botany, > > Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Chinese Academy of sciences > > Yanshan Street No. 85, Yanshan District > > Guilin 541006 > > P. R. China > > > > *发件人:* Saroj Kasaju [mailto:[email protected]] > *发送时间:* 2020年8月18日 星期二 18:52 > *收件人:* 符龙飞 > *抄送:* efloraindia; J.M. Garg > *主题:* Re: Re: Re: SK 2734 14 August 2020 > > > > Dear Dr. Fu, > > > > I have am forwarding some images of my herbarium and I find the > > petiole is not present. > > Thank you. > > > > Saroj Kasaju > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 7:27 AM 符龙飞 <[email protected]> wrote: > > Here is the holotype of E. procridioides image you can have a look. > > > > Best > > > > Fu > > > > Guangxi Key Laboratory of Plant Conservation and Restoration Ecology in > Karst Terrain, > > Guangxi Institute of Botany, > > Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Chinese Academy of sciences > > Yanshan Street No. 85, Yanshan District > > Guilin 541006 > > P. R. China > > > > *发件人:* Saroj Kasaju [mailto:[email protected]] > *发送时间:* 2020年8月16日 星期日 20:05 > *收件人:* Fu Long-Fei > *抄送:* J.M. Garg; efloraindia; Alexandre Monro > *主题:* Re: Re: Re: SK 2734 14 August 2020 > > > > > Thank you Dr. Fu. Need help from some expert😁! > > > > Saroj Kasaju > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 5:48 PM Fu Long-Fei <[email protected]> wrote: > > Not sure. There are many recently described species from Yunnan and > Xizang, China. Most of them I have little knowledge. I think if could > distinguish from them, there would be possible a new one. > > > > Best > > > > Fu > > -- > 发自我的网易邮箱手机智能版 > > > > > 在 2020-08-16 19:59:48，"Saroj Kasaju" <[email protected]> 写道： > > Any possibility of new sp.? > > Thank you. > > > > Saroj Kasaju > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 4:59 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks, Fu ji. > > > > On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 13:41, Fu Long-Fei <[email protected]> wrote: > > This species is very confusing for me since it was recorded in Flora of > China but later removed from its list. So I don’t well understand on what > it really looks like but based on my previous observation of specimens that > indentified as this name your images more or less matched. On the other > hand, your images don’t look like any other species to my knowledge. So I > gave the identification as might be ruspetre. > > > > Best > > > > Fu > > -- > 发自我的网易邮箱手机智能版 > > > > > 在 2020-08-16 15:16:59，"Saroj Kasaju" <[email protected]> 写道： > > > Thank you Dr. Fu for the ID. > > I have some confusion according to the keys of Elatostema rupestre > <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200006403> ! > > Size of plant is around 35 cm, stipules lanceolate, 10-15 × 3-5 mm - but > less, petiole 1.5-5.5 mm - no petiole noticed, > > abaxial surface sparsely strigillose along nerves, adaxial surface > sparsely hirtellous - did not notice, peduncle ca. 1 mm > > - but longer, Fl. May - From July . > > > > Saroj Kasaju > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 10:57 AM Fu Long-Fei <[email protected]> wrote: > > This one might be Elatostema rupestre > > -- > 发自我的网易邮箱手机智能版 > > > > > 在 2020-08-15 00:37:53，"Saroj Kasaju" <[email protected]> 写道： > > Dear Members, > > > > Location: Sundarijal, Kathmandu > > Date: 07 August 2020 > > Elevation: 1603 m. > > Habit : Wild > > > > Ref: Fwd: SK 2145 24 August 2019 > <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/SK$202145$2024$20August$202019/indiantreepix/o-du4-7ZgjY/yYcyjeR4AAAJ> > > > > Thank you. > > > > Saroj Kasaju > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > With regards, > J.M.Garg > > > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAEf%3DytRd9epbO3DbeyEiXd1x_fUTfVRCMbDTRcrug9k7c3omEg%40mail.gmail.com.
