Wrong distribution?? ?? Boerhavia repens L. <http://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:604264-1> Boerhavia repens L. <https://www.gbif.org/species/3086288>
Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 5:15 PM Somil Daga <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you, everyone! > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:05 AM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks, Paradesi ji. >> Yes, I agree with you. >> *Boerhavia repens *does not have distribution in India as per latest >> updates at Boerhavia >> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/m---z/n/nyctaginaceae/boerhavia> >> It should be *Commicarpus boissieri *as per >> GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=3701161> >> southafricaninsects >> <https://southafricaninsects.wordpress.com/flowers-bluepurple/commicarpus-boissieri-2/> >> Flora of Pakistan >> <http://efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=250070610> FoP >> illustration >> <http://efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=57588&flora_id=5> >> Some New records of Plants from the state of Rajasthan, India >> <https://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/article/view/2012/3602> Tiwari, >> U.L., K. Ravikumar, N. Balachandran & S.K. Sharma (2016). *Journal of >> Threatened Taxa* 8(3): 8632–8637 >> >> On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 at 22:56, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Sorry Garg Ji, It's not Commicarpus chinensis, because of there are no >>> long exserted stamens, in chinensis stamens exerted or longer than the >>> petals, >>> Stamens as long as or shorter than the petals.........B. repens >>> Stamens are longer than the petals or as long as the double length of >>> petals.................... Chinensis >>> With regards. >>> >>> On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 at 11:01, Mahadeswara <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Simply superb photographs !!! >>>> >>>> On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 9:21:56 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: >>>> >>>>> Posted by Somil ji. >>>>> >>>>> Boerhavia sp. ?? Boerhavia repens ?? >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>> >>>>> Yes it's Saroj ji, I too agree with you- from Paradesi ji. >>>>> -- >>>>> With regards, >>>>> J.M.Garg >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/0ae8ed68-17ec-46ae-ab11-212263a43965n%40googlegroups.com >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/0ae8ed68-17ec-46ae-ab11-212263a43965n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To view this discussion on the web, visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAPTGuvH1C7GATCt58VMn9Y-GUsg1gqui-rb5HFE9pJLRsTm2UQ%40mail.gmail.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAPTGuvH1C7GATCt58VMn9Y-GUsg1gqui-rb5HFE9pJLRsTm2UQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAEf%3DytSN5-SpOgT9jDOV_4xd2uweJ-y5c1%2B9Zw9bSKjPvXazhw%40mail.gmail.com.
