Thanks a lot, Singh ji. On Sun, 8 Nov 2020 at 20:21, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes Garg ji, it should be reliable. > > > > > > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. > Mob: 9810359089 > https://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ > > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 8:11 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Pl. find Ladakh checklist by L. Klimeš and B. Dickoré >> <https://www.butbn.cas.cz/ladakh/checklist.html> as published in 2009 as >> per >> >> https://sites.google.com/a/shpa.org.uk/main/flora-of-ladakh?tmpl=%2Fsystem%2Fapp%2Ftemplates%2Fprint%2F&showPrintDialog=1 >> https://www.butbn.cas.cz/klimes/desert.html >> >> I think it may be more reliable as far as Ladakh Flora is concerned. BSI >> Floras of India may have been published much earlier. It may even be better >> than Catalogue of Life and POWO, in many instances, where this data has not >> been considered by them. >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFBRFov0zbQsMN47Fxy3tf_3iioQJ6KWRPrDtTYjA%3D0Hwg%40mail.gmail.com.
