It is possible that the 3rd image is of some other species as posted by Shrikant ji as Male plant (a different plant).
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 20:46, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the following specimens from GBIF further confirms this as *Tamarix > indica* > <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=250075670> : > > https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kew.org%2Fherbcatimg%2F276964.jpg > > https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Fmedialib.naturalis.nl%2Ffile%2Fid%2FWAG.1839739%2Fformat%2Flarge > > https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Fplant.depo.msu.ru%2Fopen%2Fpublic%2Fitem%2FMW0742846%2Fimg%2F0.jpg%3Foriginal > > On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 14:22, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Can it be *Tamarix indica* >> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=250075670> as >> per FOI >> <https://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Indian%20Tamarisk.html>, >> Dinesh >> ji's images >> <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jhau_(Punjabi-_%E0%A8%9D%E0%A8%BE%E0%A8%8A)_(5386351955).jpg> >> at Wikimedia Commons >> <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Tamarix_indica>, POWO >> <http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:828129-1>, >> GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=3613074>- >> specimen >> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Frepo.rbge.org.uk%2Fimage_server.php%3Fkind%3D1500%26path_base64%3DL2hlcmJhcml1bV9zcGVjaW1lbl9zY2Fucy9FMDAvMzgyLzQwNC8zODE2MTQuanBn> >> Looks different from other images at *Tamarix dioica* >> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/m---z/t/tamaricaceae/tamarix/tamarix-dioica> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: JM Garg <[email protected]> >> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 14:05 >> Subject: [efloraofindia:365280] Fwd: Tamarix dioica >> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: Shrikant Ingalhalikar <[email protected]> >> Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 at 8:25:14 PM UTC+5:30 >> Subject: Tamarix dioica >> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *Small shrub, 1 m tall, leaves 5 cm, linear, greyish green; found on >> dried wetland at Bani in Kutchh on 4 Feb. Male inflo 5-10 cm long, female >> inflo 5 cm long, capsules 5-8 mm. I think this to be T. dioicaShrikant >> Ingalhalikar 12 Varshanand Society Anandnagar Sinhagad Road Pune 411 051. >> www.idsahyadri.com <http://www.idsahyadri.com> Tel 91 20 2435 0765. Fax 91 >> 20 2438 9190. >> <http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle?>* >> >> >> >> >> >> * -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop >> receiving emails from it, send an email to >> [email protected] >> <[email protected]>. To view this discussion on >> the web, visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/615cbf52-6e85-45a5-8804-1b220fc38c1bn%40googlegroups.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/615cbf52-6e85-45a5-8804-1b220fc38c1bn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. >> * >> >> >> >> >> *-- With regards,J.M.Garg * >> > > > > > *-- With regards,J.M.Garg * -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFAbYHxot0giGEogNBOoVOw1%2BfvMJW1w2rA4m394uyTi9w%40mail.gmail.com.
