Thanks Saroj Ji. Regards, Aarti On Saturday, January 9, 2021 at 10:44:12 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote:
> Convolvulus virgatus Boiss. is correct ID . > Thank you > Saroj Kasaju > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Ron_Convolvulaceae <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, February 21, 2011 at 8:23:02 PM UTC+5:45 > Subject: Re: Fwd: Ipomoea for ID : 280111 : AK-2 > To: efloraofindia <[email protected]> > > > > > On Feb 21, 8:50 am, Ron_Convolvulaceae <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Feb 21, 7:59 am, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > ... simply guessing: some species of Calystegia ... > http://www.exot-nutz-zier.de/impressionen_convolvulaceae_ca.htm > > > Regards. > > > Dinesh > > > > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Resurfacing again for ID > > > > > > -- > > > > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > > > > Retired Associate Professor > > > > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > > > > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. > > > > Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 > > > >http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > > From: Aarti S. Khale <[email protected]> > > > > Date: Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:34 PM > > > > Subject: Ipomoea for ID : 280111 : AK-2 > > > > To: efloraofindia <[email protected]>, Gurcharan Singh < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > Cc: androl <[email protected]> > > > > > > Again taken at Muscat,Oman. > > > > First picture taken in May,06 and the other in Feb,07.These are very > > > > common here. > > > > Aarti > > > > Hello, > > > > Dinesh ji has a worthy guess. > > > > My impression is that the plant in question is likely in the > > genus Convolvulus as the stigma is within the structural type for a > > Convolvulus and the corolla with a relatively short tube and wide > > relatively flat limb is much more typical of Convolvulus than a > > Calystegia , although some overlap of corolla features between > > Calystegia and Convolvulus does exist... > > > > The majority of Calystegia species are native to California with > > relatively few species in the Old World, whereas by comparison there > > are many species of Convolvulus in the Old World. > > > > The Convolvulus are known to cross species naturally as compared to > > Ipomoea which rarely ever crosses the species barrier naturally. > > > > There are some botanists who have proposed that all Convolvulus > > represent geographic variations of a single species with no absolute > > division , because inter-grades of Convolvulus species are to be found > > inhabiting what is proposed to be the geographic limits for a > > particular species; inter-grades of Convolvulus species blend in with > > the 'different' neighboring Convolvulus species / sharing features > > with geographic neighbors of supposedly 'different' species...therefor > > Convolvulus has so many subspecies , subsubspecies , varieties and > > forma...likely ad infinitum... > > > > Perhaps the wrong time for me to share regarding such a departure from > > the traditional / accepted classifications... > > > > The plant is some Convolvulus but more than that I can not offer at > > this point. > > > > regards, > > > > Ron > > Hello, > > I have an after-thought and that is the plant seems to match > Convolvulus virgatus in many aspects. > > regards, > > Ron > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/4cfce50a-fdc4-4a07-9027-ce9a866e5cccn%40googlegroups.com.
