Thanks a lot, Bhaskar ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg
On Thu, 18 Feb, 2021, 8:18 pm Bhaskar Adhikari, <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Garg ji > > It’s easy to differentiate D. pedicellatus and D. andersonii: if you look > at the corolla shape, its funnel-form (gradually wider opening) in > D.pedicellatus but salver-form (slender tube, narrow opening, with abruptly > widening lobes) in D. andersonii. In D. pedicellatus petioles are nearly > glabrous while in D. andersonii its densely pubescent. > > Regards > > Bhas > > *From:* J.M. Garg <[email protected]> > *Sent:* 06 February 2021 13:29 > *To:* Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> > *Cc:* Bhaskar Adhikari <[email protected]>; efloraofindia < > [email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: SK30JUL7-2016:ID > > > > Thanks, Bhaskar ji. > > Is there a key to differentiate the two as two appear quite close? > > Appears close as per GBIF specimens- specimen 1 > <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.gbif.org%2Fv1%2Fimage%2Funsafe%2Fhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.kew.org%252Fherbcatimg%252F405954.jpg&data=04%7C01%7CBAdhikari%40rbge.org.uk%7C419442371d69401299cc08d8caa323b4%7Cbb63bb00175e46b7b7b3bc74158e4fd4%7C0%7C0%7C637482149321242943%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=DWH7jXdBEMrDc7amas%2B5lP8KXEE1PTbsH0bJt%2FJDtow%3D&reserved=0> > and specimen 2 > <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.gbif.org%2Fv1%2Fimage%2Funsafe%2Fhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.jacq.org%252Fimage.php%253Ffilename%253D454845%2526method%253Deuropeana&data=04%7C01%7CBAdhikari%40rbge.org.uk%7C419442371d69401299cc08d8caa323b4%7Cbb63bb00175e46b7b7b3bc74158e4fd4%7C0%7C0%7C637482149321242943%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=0MofRk3PrY9RJ5KpZx03xxUzwK7G9Z7zyLnRnRbO6OQ%3D&reserved=0> > > > > On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 17:48, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> wrote: > > That means enclosed document is wrong! > > Thank you. > > > > Saroj Kasaju > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 4:31 PM Bhaskar Adhikari <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I don’t think it is D. pedicellatus, more closer to Didymocarpus andersonii C. > B. Clarke > > Regards > > Bhas > > > > > > > > *From:* J.M. Garg <[email protected]> > *Sent:* 29 January 2021 16:23 > *To:* efloraofindia <[email protected]> > *Cc:* Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Fwd: SK30JUL7-2016:ID > > > > Thanks, Saroj ji. > > Yes, it appears more closer to *Didymocarpus pedicellatus* R.Br. as per > GBIF > <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gbif.org%2Foccurrence%2Fgallery%3Ftaxon_key%3D6070199&data=04%7C01%7CBAdhikari%40rbge.org.uk%7C419442371d69401299cc08d8caa323b4%7Cbb63bb00175e46b7b7b3bc74158e4fd4%7C0%7C0%7C637482149321252896%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=VZH41WJQSmpZNWRq4KQ8usdB5VlZoMFS9BBWAj9X20U%3D&reserved=0> > specimens rather than *Didymocarpus primulifolius* as per GBIF > <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gbif.org%2Foccurrence%2Fgallery%3Ftaxon_key%3D6069728&data=04%7C01%7CBAdhikari%40rbge.org.uk%7C419442371d69401299cc08d8caa323b4%7Cbb63bb00175e46b7b7b3bc74158e4fd4%7C0%7C0%7C637482149321252896%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=qFWNWECydeUdwMa6FCRd2wdliTzyPKBN5UcLf2dAGAg%3D&reserved=0> > specimens and FoC illustration > <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.efloras.org%2Fobject_page.aspx%3Fobject_id%3D4108%26flora_id%3D2&data=04%7C01%7CBAdhikari%40rbge.org.uk%7C419442371d69401299cc08d8caa323b4%7Cbb63bb00175e46b7b7b3bc74158e4fd4%7C0%7C0%7C637482149321252896%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=7PLrM%2F8MkX%2F4Ml5dibpFt48VqW7Mr8dNmxcbivSrUfM%3D&reserved=0> > . > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: *Saroj Kasaju* <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 at 14:03 > Subject: SK30JUL7-2016:ID > To: J. M. Garg <[email protected]>, efloraofindia < > [email protected]> > > > > Dear Mr. Garg, > > Enclosing some pictures for identification. > Location : Kalingpong > Altitude: 5550 ft > Date: 6 July 2016 > > Pictures were shot by a friend and sent for ID ! After extensive search I > think it should be Didymocarpus peducellata. > > Thank you. > Saroj Kasaju > > > > > -- > > With regards, > J.M.Garg > > > > The Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh > <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rbge.org.uk%2F&data=04%7C01%7CBAdhikari%40rbge.org.uk%7C419442371d69401299cc08d8caa323b4%7Cbb63bb00175e46b7b7b3bc74158e4fd4%7C0%7C0%7C637482149321362418%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=KFzt%2B7KRjIpGUikBpZLgK8ocwuxCDWsvf5f3k1ncFqc%3D&reserved=0> > is a charity registered in Scotland (No SC007983) | Support Us > <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rbge.org.uk%2Fsupport-us&data=04%7C01%7CBAdhikari%40rbge.org.uk%7C419442371d69401299cc08d8caa323b4%7Cbb63bb00175e46b7b7b3bc74158e4fd4%7C0%7C0%7C637482149321362418%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=l4Hd6fzvSTk1%2Bd4oJDUFkG7ugqhaiJkEYl5OgZaeFyU%3D&reserved=0> > > This notice applies to this email and to any other email subsequently sent > by anyone at RBGE and appearing in the same chain of email correspondence. > References below to "this email" should be read accordingly. This e-mail > and its attachments (if any) are confidential, may be protected by > copyright and may be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, > notify us immediately by reply e-mail, delete it and do not use, disclose > or copy it. Unless we expressly say otherwise in this e-mail, this e-mail > does not create, form part of, or vary, any contractual or unilateral > obligation. No liability is accepted for viruses and it is your > responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Where this e-mail is unrelated > to the business of RBGE, the opinions expressed within this e-mail are the > opinions of the sender and do not necessarily constitute those of RBGE. > RBGE emails are filtered and monitored. > > > > > -- > > With regards, > J.M.Garg > > The Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh <https://www.rbge.org.uk> is a charity > registered in Scotland (No SC007983) | Support Us > <https://www.rbge.org.uk/support-us> > > This notice applies to this email and to any other email subsequently sent > by anyone at RBGE and appearing in the same chain of email correspondence. > References below to "this email" should be read accordingly. This e-mail > and its attachments (if any) are confidential, may be protected by > copyright and may be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, > notify us immediately by reply e-mail, delete it and do not use, disclose > or copy it. Unless we expressly say otherwise in this e-mail, this e-mail > does not create, form part of, or vary, any contractual or unilateral > obligation. No liability is accepted for viruses and it is your > responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Where this e-mail is unrelated > to the business of RBGE, the opinions expressed within this e-mail are the > opinions of the sender and do not necessarily constitute those of RBGE. > RBGE emails are filtered and monitored. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFA0bZ4%3D5pr794wUFRJUEaNANoQV%2Ba4iYHt3fyxXzAMCcg%40mail.gmail.com.
