Thanks, Singh ji, So finally we take our plants <https://efloraofindia.com/2011/03/18/oxalis-latifolia/> as *Oxalis dehradunensis* (syn: *O. intermedia* A.Rich. (following POWO <http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:663326-1>, while ignoring Catalogue of Life <http://www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-checklist/2019/details/species/id/de5eab6841244185c75a2e85fc4f5d25>, which lists *Oxalis intermedia* A. Rich. as a syn. of *Oxalis latifolia* subsp. *latifolia*); *O. latifolia* auct. plur. (non H.B.K.), in view of your recent observations in other threads.
On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 07:31, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > Not all Garg ji. Let us scrutinise them. My Kashmir plant is O. latifolia, > whereas Chakrata plant is O. dehradunensis. > > > > > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. > https://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ > > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 10:04 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks, Singh ji, >> So should we take our plants as *Oxalis dehradunensis* (syn: *O. >> latifolia* auct. plur. (non H.B.K.)? >> >> On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 21:50, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> According to BSI Flora of India O. latifolia of most Indian authors is >>> O. dehradunensis. O. latifolia H.B.K. is not listed in the Flora >>> 1. Oxalis latifolia H.B.K: longer stamen filaments 5-6 mm long, hairy in >>> upper part with 1 mm long appendages on outside; shorter filaments glabrous >>> or sparsely hairy; leaves larger upto 5 cm long, upto 8 cm wide; flowers >>> light purple with green throat; umbela 5-20 flowered >>> 1. Oxalis dehradunensis: (syn: O. latifolia auct. plur. (non H.B.K.): >>> Longer filaments 4 mm long, pubescent, without appendages, short ones >>> hairy; leaves smaller 1.5 cm long, 3 cm wide; flowers purple violet; >>> flowers 5-6 flowered. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >>> Retired Associate Professor >>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >>> https://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 3:50 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> All our observations are currently at Oxalis latifolia subsp. >>>> latifolia (Introduced) >>>> <https://efloraofindia.com/2011/03/18/oxalis-latifolia/> >>>> Pl. see discussions at Flora of Chakrata: Oxalis dehradunensis from >>>> Mussoorie Chakrata Motor Marg >>>> <http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix/browse_thread/thread/5e6d0546759ab5f1?hl=en_IN#> >>>> for >>>> the confusion between the two. >>>> >>>> On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 12:31, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> With regards, >>>>> J. M. Garg >>>>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>> From: Sunit Singh Chauhan <[email protected]> >>>>> Date: Thu, 4 Mar, 2021, 12:04 pm >>>>> Subject: >>>>> To: J.M. Garg <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Dear sir good morning. >>>>> Is there any difference in Oxalis dehradunensis and Oxalis latifolia? >>>>> On the base of leaves both look the same, flowers are alike. >>>>> >>>>> attaching images of latifolia here >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> *Thanks & Regards* >>>>> 𝗦𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁 𝗦𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗵 >>>>> 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝗳𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 >>>>> 𝗛𝗡𝗕 𝗖𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝘁𝘆 >>>>> 𝗨𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗸𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗱 >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> With regards, >>>> J.M.Garg >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFAkBf3M3kjj0uFQsPB2HOrLHfOyxuk2g2kScYMw5KdNuQ%40mail.gmail.com.
