Thank you, Sir. But, I am afraid, no solanaceae member, listed in Flora of Nepal <http://www.efloras.org/browse.aspx?flora_id=110&start_taxon_id=10828>, meets your species.
Only, *Solanum erianthum <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/m---z/s/solanaceae/solanum/solanum-erianthum>* (NOT your plant) may attain the assumed size of your species. There is one introduced species in India (Asam) <http://plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:814696-1>, *Brunfelsia uniflora*, (https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=2932913) that may attain the size of your plant - https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Finaturalist-open-data.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fphotos%2F35821299%2Foriginal.jpeg%3F1556265165 I do not think your plant belongs to any of the above two Solanaceae members. Thank you. Best regards, Surajit Koley On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 at 12:13, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> wrote: > Dealer Surjit ji ! > > It is a small bushy shrub not very thick branches about 5/6 m. only ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 7:33 PM surajit koley < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Saroj Sir, >> >> I attach here resized photographs of your plant sp. Please, confirm all >> pictures are from the same plant. >> >> Please, forgive me, I ask you this because the last picture seems to >> display ripe fruit and after uploading the same you asked to ignore it - >> https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/E83ztn9_gqc/m/1Am_ULdYBAAJ >> >> And, also the tree is around 70 to 100 ft? >> >> Can any member tell me which Solanaceace has 70ft representative in >> Indian subcontinent? >> >> Thank you. >> Best regards, >> Surajit Koley >> >> >> On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 at 17:02, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Detailed images available at SK 2436 06 February 2020 >>> <https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/E83ztn9_gqc> >>> Forwarding again for Id assistance please. >>> >>> Some earlier relevant feedback: >>> >>> Any idea about the family ? Detailed images available at SK 2436 06 >>> February 2020 <https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/E83ztn9_gqc>- >>> from me >>> >>> Solanaceae, Cestrum sp.,- from Paradesi ji >>> No match with any Cestrum >>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=110&taxon_id=106283> ! >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Saroj Kasaju >>> >>> Any Jasminum species ?- from me >>> Couldn't find any match, Sir. >>> 70-100 ft tall *Jasminum* or *Cestrum*? Don't know of any. >>> I would think of member of Lauraceae, like *Litsea*, but again couldn't >>> find a suitable match. >>> Thank you. >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Surajit Koley >>> >>> Not Cestrum, Jasminum or Litsea, Its definitely a member of Solanaceae, >>> but without flower and mature fruit, cannot say anything with surety.- from >>> Rajeev Singh ji >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> From: Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 15:17 >>> Subject: Re: SK 2436 06 February 2020 >>> To: efloraindia <[email protected]>, J.M. Garg < >>> [email protected]> >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Saroj Kasaju >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 3:31 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 3:31 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear Members >>>>> >>>>> Location: Ranibari, Kathmandu >>>>> Date: 10 September 2019 >>>>> Elevation: 1370 m. >>>>> Habitat : Wild. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> With regards, >>> J.M.Garg >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAMV_mc3q91ozpkKpZFipcT5pb_ut0LSQocUu3gbGV%3DNLuO1xOg%40mail.gmail.com.
