Thank you very very much Garg ji, for correcting this ID. I have revised my notes at flickr. However at Wikimedia I am not conversant with making changes.
It is *Staurogyne spatulata* (Blume) Koord. at POWO <http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:55335-1> and GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/species/169095024> ... I also find it written as *spathulata* at a few places but am not sure which is to be treated as correct. Regards. Dinesh On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 4:09 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Dinesh ji, > Your images of *Staurogyne zeylanica *in Flickr > <https://www.flickr.com/photos/dinesh_valke/6923006285/in/photostream/> > and Wikimedia Commons > <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Staurogyne_zeylanica> are of > *Staurogyne > spathulata* (BI.) Koord. > <https://efloraofindia.com/species/a---l/a/acanthaceae/staurogyne/staurogyne-glauca> > (syn: > S. glauca) as per images and details herein and as per keys in Flora of > Peninsular India > <http://flora-peninsula-indica.ces.iisc.ac.in/herbsheet.php?id=321&cat=7> > . > Look different from specimens of *Staurogyne zeylanica* in GBIF > <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=3772938>. > Pl. correct. > -- > With regards, > J.M.Garg > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CABSQqC2PHKJYnP7VPoUE3FYE%2BORkZQaCV0KJPyvCTZqkWvqppw%40mail.gmail.com.
