Forwarding for ID Distributed as Dendropthoe species- Mumbai <https://efloraofindia.com/2018/04/02/mumbai-d133/> Group discussion at Fwd: [efloraofindia:180145] Fwd: 190810 AK1 (google.com) <https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/-1wAgZykroI>
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: JM Garg <[email protected]> Date: Saturday, January 25, 2014 at 4:38:49 PM UTC+5:30 Subject: Fwd: [efloraofindia:180145] Fwd: 190810 AK1 To: efloraofindia <[email protected]> Cc: Dr. Arvind Kadus <[email protected]>, Navendu <[email protected]>, Vijayasankar <[email protected]>, N P Balakrishnan <[email protected]>, tchakrab <[email protected]>, Smita <[email protected]> Forwarding again with a subject line as thread is getting broken. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: JM Garg <[email protected]> Date: 25 January 2014 15:30 Subject: [efloraofindia:180145] Fwd: To: efloraofindia <[email protected]>, arvind kadus < [email protected]>, navendu page <[email protected]>, Vijayasankar Raman <[email protected]>, Nambiyath Balakrishnan <[email protected]>, Tapas Chakrabarty <[email protected]>, smilingsmit <[email protected]> Forwarding again for Id assistance please. Some earlier relevant feedback: Dendropthoe falcata var amplexicaulis as described in Flora of Bombay navendu Loranthus sp. Santhosh Foliage looks similar to Calycanthus occidentalis (if introduced.) Regards-- Ken. Memecylon species?? <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.biotik.org%2Findia%2Fspecies%2Fm%2Fmemewigh%2Fmemewigh_en.html&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNF1GLHcN9aY4t9RXqgjGIt3uqbCVQ>*http://www.biotik.org/india/species/m/memewigh/memewigh_en.html <http://www.biotik.org/india/species/m/memewigh/memewigh_en.html> <http://www.biotik.org/india/species/m/memewigh/memewigh_en.html>* <http://www.biotik.org/india/species/m/memewigh/memewigh_en.html> Regards Vijayasankar It is Memecylon umbelatum- from Smita ji. "*We need to ask Arvind Kadus if it was a parasitic shrub on a tree. I still strongly believe its Dendropthoe falcata var. amplexicaulis* navendu" Dear all this plant is located on the other plant at round about 20-25 ft hight. Could not captured more photos.The plant was without any flowers or fruits at that time. I thought that, it was a climber. No more information. Dr.kadus Arvind, Pune. On Thursday, August 19, 2010 5:35:56 PM UTC+5:30, Dr. Arvind Kadus wrote: > ID Request please.. > Dr. kadus arvind,Pune. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- With regards, J.M.Garg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna' The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a *thousand species* & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise): http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg. You can also use them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image. For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group (largest in the world): http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix (more than 2200 members & 1,78,400 messages on 31/12/13) or Efloraofindia website: https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/ (with a species database of more than 9000 species & 1,80, 000 images). Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of India'. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/e5ded0b0-246e-46c4-bb6c-dc35f5da8995n%40googlegroups.com.
