POWO <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:184091-2>
gives it as a syn. of *Parthenocissus quinquefolia *(L.) Planch.
There is another closer taxon as *Parthenocissus vitacea* (Knerr) Hitchc.
as per POWO
<https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:184109-2>, with
many forms and varieties of *Parthenocissus quinquefolia* and *Parthenocissus
inserta* as synonyms.

On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 18:13, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:

> Pathenocissus inserta often confused with P. quinquefolia but
> differentiated by lustrous leaflets (not opaque), tendrils with less than
> six branches (not six or more), tips of tendril branches pointed (not with
> discs) and dichotomous inflorescence (not racemose). photographed from
> along Burnhampthorpe Rd Mississauga, Canada, 29-8-2019
>
>
>
>
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Retired  Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> https://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "efloraofindia" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAHiXKpUJseR_bQwok4m2TG8MuLBWspGbkL3OA9Ktd%2B5Qv%3DG5Sw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAHiXKpUJseR_bQwok4m2TG8MuLBWspGbkL3OA9Ktd%2B5Qv%3DG5Sw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>


-- 
With regards,
J.M.Garg

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFBsvm2SZUHeiiOE-3wKE_%2BcNT2U9q9rnZFobf5W0c27%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to