Thanks Garg ji, I will check. On Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 12:31:45 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote:
> I have some doubts as the stem is not erect as per > https://fieldguide.mt.gov/speciesDetail.aspx?elcode=PDBOR0B070 > > Also see > https://gobotany.nativeplanttrust.org/species/cynoglossum/officinale/ > > https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cynoglossum_officinale#/media/File:Illustration_Cynoglossum_officinale0.jpg > https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:115233-1 > https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/14550#toPictures > https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/forb/cynoff/all.html > > > > On Sat, 4 Dec 2021 at 18:48, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Cynoglossum officinale, clicked from Rattray marsh, Mississauga, Canada, >> 23-8-2019 >> >> >> >> >> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >> Retired Associate Professor >> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >> https://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "efloraofindia" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web, visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAHiXKpVUdjGLKVVfTZhJHk5d9JDdmSinHK6sQiiwrEzTsDaCUA%40mail.gmail.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAHiXKpVUdjGLKVVfTZhJHk5d9JDdmSinHK6sQiiwrEzTsDaCUA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > > > -- > With regards, > J.M.Garg > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/b7ab1638-098c-44e8-9ca9-de52a80a64bfn%40googlegroups.com.
