What do you say about the following?: I think *C. argyracanthum* (POWO <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:195029-1>)- as per POWO specimen one <http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/detailsQuery.do?barcode=K001118167>, two <http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/detailsQuery.do?barcode=K000250088> (based on my views at Cirsium argyracanthum from Himachal Pradesh-GS31122021-3 <https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/z4yx1bTWqVI>) It is sometimes difficult to judge the size of heads in close up images. A habit image gives a better perspective.
On Sun, 2 Jan 2022 at 15:17, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > C wallichii is very distinctive Garg ji. > > > > > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. > https://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ > > > On Sun, Jan 2, 2022 at 2:55 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Maybe a lot of threads (looking similar to your this post) also needs to >> be moved from our page at Cirsium wallichii >> <https://efloraofindia.com/2013/06/14/cirsium-wallichii/> as these look >> different from POWO >> <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:196195-1> >> specimens- one <http://www.kew.org/herbcatimg/684784.jpg>, two >> <http://www.kew.org/herbcatimg/684782.jpg>, three >> <http://www.kew.org/herbcatimg/359204.jpg> to *C. argyracanthum* (POWO >> <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:195029-1>)- >> specimen one >> <http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/detailsQuery.do?barcode=K001118167>, two >> <http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/detailsQuery.do?barcode=K000250088> >> It is sometimes difficult to judge the size of heads in close up images. >> A habit image gives a better perspective. >> >> On Sun, 2 Jan 2022 at 13:41, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> No, I do not agree. No nodding heads. >>> I think *C. argyracanthum* (POWO >>> <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:195029-1>)- >>> as per POWO specimen one >>> <http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/detailsQuery.do?barcode=K001118167>, two >>> <http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/detailsQuery.do?barcode=K000250088> (based >>> on my views at Cirsium argyracanthum from Himachal Pradesh-GS31122021-3 >>> <https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/z4yx1bTWqVI>) >>> >>> On Sun, 2 Jan 2022 at 13:28, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Here is another population from Pahalgam Kashmir, alt. 2800 m, which >>>> appears C. falconeri with very clear woolly heads of C. falconeri, but more >>>> stunted plants and somewhat clustered heads, 23-6-2011. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >>>> Retired Associate Professor >>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >>>> https://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAHiXKpW%3DHoXoo26uUvfSe1EYeJW5PxQ5WLK0%3D8KPxr3fNck4ZQ%40mail.gmail.com >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAHiXKpW%3DHoXoo26uUvfSe1EYeJW5PxQ5WLK0%3D8KPxr3fNck4ZQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> With regards, >>> J.M.Garg >>> >> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFD-JV8hw-mtySWz6YTga%3DPrLfSJ45y1%3DR5XE6V3uhL9iw%40mail.gmail.com.
