When whole India is marked, how can you exclude Western Himalayas. FBI says throughout India from 1-6000 ft, Himalayas from Kashmir to Assam; Collett records from Simla.
On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 1:54:38 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Western Himalaya is neither marked in the map nor stated in the text in > POWO > <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:47485-1#synonyms> > . > It is specifically mentioned in POWO, whenever there is a distribution. > POWO always mentions the following (for India and Nepal) in its text: > Western Himalaya, > Eastern Himalaya, > Assam, > Nepal, > India (other than above) > > For other aspects, I will again have a re-look. > > > > > On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 at 13:09, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Whole of India is marked. If it is in Pakistan, Western Himalayas is >> automatically covered. POWO treats it as accepted name and I want we should >> follow it >> All three similar species are listed in FBI (under names D. riparia, D. >> roxburghiana and D. roxburghiana var. bupleuroides): Here is comparison of >> accepted names >> >> D. riparia Nees is distributed in Pegu and Tenassarim (Myanmar),FBI >> according to Flora China Nepal, Myanmar to Yunan: Lesves ovate, obtuse >> often emarginate bracts, bracteoles 6 mm, linear. >> D. chinensis (L.) Juss. (Syn: D. roxburghiana Nees): Leaves >> ovate-elliptic, base cuneate to attenuate, decurrent on petiole, outer >> bracteoles 5-13 mm x 3-8 mm , less than twice as long as broad, corolla >> 10-12 mm long; Throughout India >> D. bupleuroides Nees (Syn: D. roxburghiana var. bupleuroides (Nees) >> Clarke): leaves ovate, base cuneate; outer bracteoles 5-7 mm long, more >> than twice as long as broad; corolla 5 mm long.; Throughout India >> When looking for specimens from Western Himalayas we have to be vigilant >> about size of corolla and relative length breadth ratio of outer bracteoles. >> >> Looking at corolla size it safely fits into D. bupleuroides >> On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 11:42:54 AM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: >> >>> Thanks, Singh ji, >>> No distribution in W. Himalayas according to POWO >>> <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:47485-1#synonyms> >>> . >>> Also see discussions at thread: Dicliptera bupleuroides Nees (accepted >>> name) ??? >>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/indiantreepix/8yOt1uf4EyA> >>> >>> On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 at 11:27, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Dicliptera riparia has distribution only in Eastern Himalayas, not in >>>> Western Himalayas. >>>> I should be D. chinensis (L.) Juss. (Syn: D. roxburghiana Nees) which >>>> has distribution in most of India including W. Himalayas according to >>>> POWO >>>> <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:47485-1#synonyms> >>>> >>>> On Thursday, July 16, 2020 at 2:59:38 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: >>>> >>>>> On further examination and discussions at thread: Dicliptera >>>>> bupleuroides Nees (accepted name) ??? >>>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/indiantreepix/8yOt1uf4EyA> , >>>>> I feel it should be *Dicliptera riparia * >>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/a/acanthaceae/dicliptera/dicliptera-riparia> >>>>> Nees >>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/a/acanthaceae/dicliptera/dicliptera-riparia> >>>>> >>>>> (syn: *Dicliptera roxburghiana* var. *riparia* (Nees) Benoist) as per >>>>> distribution, specimens and references herein. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 18:46, JM Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> *Dicliptera chinensis* >>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/a/acanthaceae/dicliptera/dicliptera-roxburghii> >>>>>> >>>>>> as per images and details herein. Looks different from *Dicliptera >>>>>> bupleuroides* >>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/a/acanthaceae/dicliptera/dicliptera-bupleuroides> >>>>>> as >>>>>> per images and details herein. >>>>>> *Differences* between the two species are better appreciated as per *FoC >>>>>> illustration* >>>>>> <http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=119439&flora_id=2> >>>>>> and *FoP illustration* >>>>>> <http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=86909&flora_id=5> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sunday, 22 August 2010 18:24:42 UTC+5:30, Gurcharan Singh wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Dicliptera bupleuroides Nees (syn: Dicliptera roxburghina auct. (non >>>>>>> Nees which is synonym of D. chinensis)) from Mandi H. P., common in the >>>>>>> Himalayas at lower altitudes ascending to 2200 m, not to be confused >>>>>>> with >>>>>>> Peristrophe roxburghiana (Roem. et Schult.) Bremek (syn: P. tinctoria >>>>>>> (Roxb.) Nees) which is a cultivated species with much larger flowers >>>>>>> (nearly 3 cm as against 1.5-2 cm in D. bupleuroides) and few flowers >>>>>>> generally towards top of branches. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://yunol.stes.tc.edu.tw/gallery2/d/209-2/20100711_005.jpg >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://yunol.stes.tc.edu.tw/gallery2/d/209-2/20100711_005.jpg&imgrefurl=http://yunol.stes.tc.edu.tw/gallery2/main.php%3Fg2_view%3Dslideshow.Slideshow%26g2_itemId%3D213&usg=__zqlECVWtB2wDjIaKrXmsz9ECyTk=&h=479&w=640&sz=48&hl=en&start=0&sig2=eBBDnDH1B02PZKcNMyz6Jg&zoom=1&tbnid=ssB-HCsrXu64GM:&tbnh=136&tbnw=202&ei=LxBxTP-sPMePcJi4_IoN&prev=/images%3Fq%3Ddicliptera%2Broxburghiana%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26biw%3D1280%26bih%3D673%26tbs%3Disch:1&um=1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=979&vpy=209&dur=2744&hovh=194&hovw=260&tx=158&ty=125&oei=LxBxTP-sPMePcJi4_IoN&esq=1&page=1&ndsp=28&ved=1t:429,r:13,s:0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >>>>>>> Retired Associate Professor >>>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >>>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >>>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >>>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/62ab74c3-5922-422f-9dfb-2c4949061feao%40googlegroups.com >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/62ab74c3-5922-422f-9dfb-2c4949061feao%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> With regards, >>>>> J.M.Garg >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> >>> To view this discussion on the web, visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/83a0471a-dfd4-4e06-b12e-39944c2a55e1n%40googlegroups.com >>>> >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/83a0471a-dfd4-4e06-b12e-39944c2a55e1n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> With regards, >>> J.M.Garg >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "efloraofindia" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> > To view this discussion on the web, visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/b7b5eb94-0923-4c35-b08d-180bf65ecffcn%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/b7b5eb94-0923-4c35-b08d-180bf65ecffcn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > > > -- > With regards, > J.M.Garg > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/e1af0086-be03-445a-8548-e157b0eebc7fn%40googlegroups.com.
