Hi, Dinesh ji, Your Wikimedia Commons images at Wikimedia Commons <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Staurogyne_zeylanica>, are still to be corrected.
On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 17:26, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you very very much Garg ji, for correcting this ID. > I have revised my notes at flickr. However at Wikimedia I am not > conversant with making changes. > > It is *Staurogyne spatulata* (Blume) Koord. at POWO > <http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:55335-1> > and GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/species/169095024> ... I also find it > written as *spathulata* at a few places but am not sure which is to be > treated as correct. > > Regards. > Dinesh > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 4:09 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, Dinesh ji, >> Your images of *Staurogyne zeylanica *in Flickr >> <https://www.flickr.com/photos/dinesh_valke/6923006285/in/photostream/> >> and Wikimedia Commons >> <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Staurogyne_zeylanica> are >> of *Staurogyne spathulata* (BI.) Koord. >> <https://efloraofindia.com/species/a---l/a/acanthaceae/staurogyne/staurogyne-glauca> >> (syn: >> S. glauca) as per images and details herein and as per keys in Flora of >> Peninsular India >> <http://flora-peninsula-indica.ces.iisc.ac.in/herbsheet.php?id=321&cat=7> >> . >> Look different from specimens of *Staurogyne zeylanica* in GBIF >> <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=3772938>. >> Pl. correct. >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFCAU5E7QcW4NdVZ7GM7dSuSLyqkbaWK_J2z5TdEY3ohTQ%40mail.gmail.com.
