Pl. see more feedback at ID request-080610-PKA1 <https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/BOp68ezs4jI/m/Pw1oJ6MjBQAJ> and MS,June,2018/Subshrub for id. <https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/wLLL23xE3eE/m/lMSUswRMBAAJ>
On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 at 23:00, Tabish <[email protected]> wrote: > From the limited view of the plant in Prashant's images, this was the best > match people could come up with. I agree that distribution in India is not > shown anywhere, but then it is a bordering area. The general agreement with > Sorbus hupehensis appears reasonable, if not good > http://www.iplant.cn/info/Sorbus%20hupehensis?t=p > however, I wouldn't bet on it very strongly. > Tabish > ------------------------------------------- > <http://www.flowersofindia.net>www.flowersofindia.net > The waterhole of flower lovers > > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 6:40 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, Tabish ji, >> I have doubts about the id of images of Sorbus hupehensis in FOI >> <http://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Hupeh%20Rowan.html>, being >> correct as per POWO >> <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:741787-1> >> and Flora of China >> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200011686>. >> Also they do not show its distribution in India. Also not shown in BSI >> flora of India >> <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/speciesList_PCL.action?resultType=genusWise&parent_Id=20676&parent_Name=sorbus> >> . >> So pl. correct. >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFCV9O%3Ds49Dqkn-TCGfYLMbFeuQ_A8iOafo%2BV%3DkL8iyXog%40mail.gmail.com.
