Thank Garg ji,
  I think you are right. Prashant's plant has flowers on a very short
peduncle. It should be Psydrax umbellata.
   Tabish
-------------------------------------------
<http://www.flowersofindia.net>www.flowersofindia.net
The waterhole of flower lovers


On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 5:41 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi, Tabish ji,
> Prashant ji's images of Psydrax dicoccos in FOI
> <http://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Ceylon%20Boxwood.html>,
> looks to be of Psydrax umbellatus
> <https://efloraofindia.com/2013/01/30/psydrax-umbellatus/>, as per images
> and details herein and as flowers umbellate on a short very stout
> compressed peduncle as per IBIS Flora (Flora of British India)
> <https://flora.indianbiodiversity.org/content/canthium-umbellatum-wight> vis
> a vis cymes compressed shortly peduncled for Canthium didymum C.F.Gaertn.
> <https://flora.indianbiodiversity.org/content/canthium-didymum-cfgaertn> (syn.
> of *Psydrax dicoccos* var. *dicoccos* as per POWO
> <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77171008-1>) as
> per IBIS Flora (Flora of British India)
> <https://flora.indianbiodiversity.org/content/canthium-didymum-cfgaertn>.
> Pl. correct.
> --
> With regards,
> J.M.Garg
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"eFloraofIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CALTV20dmgcf2nVeg2UAk8SuzOBt5Zam4sz%3D1s16obsGVHnXb5g%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to