Yes Garg ji, you are right On Saturday, September 3, 2022 at 3:08:45 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote:
> Taking it as *Vincetoxicum kenouriense* (Wight) Wight, Icon. Pl. Ind. > Orient., pl. 1614. 1850 (syn: *Cynanchum kenouriense* Wight, Contr. Bot. > India 58. 1834.) as per Taxonomy of Vincetoxicum s.str. (Asclepiadoideae, > Apocynaceae) from southern Asia including three new species and resurrected > names <https://phytokeys.pensoft.net/article/62514/>- Sayed Afzal Shah, > Amir Sultan, Jun Wen , Zahid Ullah , Surat Un Nisa, Zhumei Ren , Muhammad > Maqsood Alam, Javed Iqbal, Abdul Samad Mumtaz - June 2021PhytoKeys > 179(1):35-73 > It states "*Corolla* tube ca. 1 mm long, *lobes *oblong with obtuse > apices, 3–3.5 × 1–2 mm,* glabrous within or sparse caducous trichomes > present*" > Thanks to the authors for solving the puzzle. > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Nidhan Singh <[email protected]> > Date: Sun, 2 Sept 2012 at 11:16 > Subject: Fwd: [efloraofindia:128029] Flora of Chakrata 2012: Herb for Id, > Similar herb uploaded in VOF week > To: indiantreepix <[email protected]> > > > Dear All, > > Identification of this plant is pending from Chakrata region, now in > VOF week, there was a similar upload by Prashant Ji named Cynanchum > vincetoxicum...I think this is the same plant...hope to get any > comments this time... > > -- > Regards, > > Dr. Nidhan Singh > Department of Botany > I.B. (PG) College > Panipat-132103 Haryana > Ph.: 09416371227 > > -- > > > > > > -- > With regards, > J.M.Garg > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/e102ea1d-c028-4565-9520-e158ec62962an%40googlegroups.com.
