Then, you should check: Species with distribution in annotated checklist of Flowering plants of Nepal <http://www.efloras.org/browse.aspx?flora_id=110&start_taxon_id=125428> I tried to check these. Pl. check *Pilea bracteosa* as per POWO <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:855265-1> specimen <http://www.kew.org/herbcatimg/324957.jpg?_gl=1*l84xin*_ga*OTQwMDM4NzczLjE2NjA2NDc5MjU.*_ga_ZVV2HHW7P6*MTY2NDM0MzM0Ny45Ni4xLjE2NjQzNDM2NzkuMC4wLjA.> .
On Sun, 25 Sept 2022 at 12:33, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> wrote: > I do not think it is ! > Thank you Mr. Garg. > Saroj Kasaju > > On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 at 12:32 pm, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What do you it being Chamabainia cuspidata >> <https://efloraofindia.com/2019/09/14/chamabainia-cuspidata/> ? >> >> On Thu, 22 Sept 2022 at 17:12, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> 符龙飞 <[email protected]> >>> Tue, Jan 26, 2021, 8:53 AM >>> to me >>> >>> Dear Saroj Kasaju >>> >>> >>> >>> The images look like Pilea cordistipulata or P. aquarum. But two are >>> likely not recorded in Nepal. It is too hard to confirm Pilea without >>> flowers. >>> >>> >>> >>> Best >>> >>> >>> >>> Fu >>> >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Saroj Kasaju >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 5:26 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Same location on 16 September 2022. >>>> >>>> https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/ngcdzoHHO7U/m/MbHkfUTSAAAJ >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > -- > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFBBYhySd7pSXNZ896khFFBdhXNdyX9zjusa6GgpTqvFPg%40mail.gmail.com.
