In that case it would be a new record for Nepal ! Let us wait for the opinion from Dr. Wood.
Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 1:39 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, you seem to be right as per GBIF > <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=3677757> specimens (one > <https://www.gbif.org/tools/zoom/simple.html?src=//api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Fmedialib.naturalis.nl%2Ffile%2Fid%2FL.2723920%2Fformat%2Flarge> > and two > <https://www.gbif.org/tools/zoom/simple.html?src=//api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Fquod.lib.umich.edu%2Fcgi%2Fi%2Fimage%2Fapi%2Fimage%2Fherb00ic%3A1521660%3AMICH-V-1521660%2Ffull%2Fres%3A0%2F0%2Fnative.jpg>) > and FoC illustration > <http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=86473&flora_id=2> and > Rareplamseeds <https://www.rarepalmseeds.com/argyreia-wallichii>. > > On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 at 18:04, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> wrote: > >> By any means could it be I*pomoea staplesii *J.R.I.Wood & Scotland syn : >> *Argyreia >> wallichii *Choisy ?? >> >> https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rarepalmseeds.com%2Fimage%2Fcache%2Fdata%2Fa%2Fargyreia-wallichii_0_1_800x1600_38f67.jpg&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rarepalmseeds.com%2Fargyreia-wallichii&tbnid=71Trub4vS2bwpM&vet=12ahUKEwiS7OqMuYj9AhUhjtgFHXLaCdAQMygAegUIARCvAQ..i&docid=GtO09bt8SCxcdM&w=800&h=800&q=Argyreia%20wallichii&hl=en&client=safari&ved=2ahUKEwiS7OqMuYj9AhUhjtgFHXLaCdAQMygAegUIARCvAQ >> >> https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fplants.jstor.org%2Ffsi%2Fimg%2Fsize1%2Falukaplant%2Fk%2Fphase_01%2Fk0007%2Fk000830657.jpg&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fplants.jstor.org%2Fstable%2F10.5555%2Fal.ap.specimen.k000830657&tbnid=IEERigFOSzV6sM&vet=12ahUKEwiS7OqMuYj9AhUhjtgFHXLaCdAQMygJegUIARDBAQ..i&docid=ZnH78CwvKQ-ZoM&w=141&h=200&itg=1&q=Argyreia%20wallichii&hl=en&client=safari&ved=2ahUKEwiS7OqMuYj9AhUhjtgFHXLaCdAQMygJegUIARDBAQ >> >> However, there is no distribution for Nepal. >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 12:59 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Could not find a match as per comparative images at Argyreia >>> <https://efloraofindia.com/2011/02/07/argyreia/> >>> I checked all the species listed in the Checklist of Nepal >>> <http://www.efloras.org/browse.aspx?flora_id=110&start_taxon_id=102554> >>> . >>> Maybe *Argyreia roxburghii* >>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=110&taxon_id=200018784> as >>> per GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=8530381> >>> specimens- one >>> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fn2t.net%2Fark%3A%2F65665%2Fm3a476e9a2-32d6-412e-9bc2-ecc804a96a92> >>> and two >>> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fn2t.net%2Fark%3A%2F65665%2Fm3b0cff3b2-beee-47cc-ac1b-f3928c5298bf> >>> . >>> >>> >>> --------- Forwarded message --------- >>> From: Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 at 14:07 >>> Subject: Re: SK 2282 08 November 2019 >>> To: efloraindia <[email protected]>, J.M. Garg < >>> [email protected]> >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Saroj Kasaju >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:21 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:19 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear Members, >>>>> >>>>> Location: Ranimahal, Palpa >>>>> Date: 25 September 2019 >>>>> Elevation:648 m. >>>>> Habit : Wild >>>>> >>>>> Which Argyreia ? Central part of flower is not dark compared to >>>>> images in Net! >>>>> >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> With regards, >>> J.M.Garg >>> >> > > -- > With regards, > J.M.Garg > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAEf%3DytSuoTkReFfAsS6vipTfOcgFTBFOn1iPRWGOzkUsSzT3xQ%40mail.gmail.com.
