Garg Ji,
Thanks for the correction.
Regards,
Aarti

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 4:59 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think it is more likely to be A. indica (as per FoC illustration
> <http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=120485&flora_id=2> and
> description
> <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/taxonList.action?id=5050&type=4>
>  and distribution
> <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/taxonList.action?id=6810&type=5> as
> per BSI Flora of India
> <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/taxonList.action?id=6810&type=5>)
> rather than A.dubia (as per FoC illustration
> <http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=121150&flora_id=2> and
> description in Flora of China
> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200023206>)
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Aarti S. Khale <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 at 12:56
> Subject: [efloraofindia:141441] Plant for ID : MNP,Mumbai : 271212 : AK-1
> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]>
>
>
> A small plant at Maharashtra Nature Park, Mumbai seen in the medical
> plants section on 21/11/12.
> Plants about 1 foot tall, not more.
> Id please.
> Aarti
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> With regards,
> J.M.Garg
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"eFloraofIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAJ6xDqaNnku2HJ49rVb3GP0o4NDwk6B__s_wkEv6%2Bzxr1wW17g%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to