Thanks, Tapas ji. There is only one specimen <https://www.gbif.org/tools/zoom/simple.html?src=//api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Fmedialib.naturalis.nl%2Ffile%2Fid%2FL.1790333%2Fformat%2Flarge> of this in GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/species/4177419> and it looks different to me. *Actinodaphne reticulata* Meisn. has been reported in the Checklist of Nepal.
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 17:35, Tapas Chakrabarty <[email protected]> wrote: > I beg to differ. I think the samples posted by Saroj ji should belong to > Actinodaphne longipes Kosterm. which is possibly unrecorded for Nepal. > Anyway, for fomally reporting the occurrence of the species from Nepal, we > need flowering or fruiting material and herbarium specimens. > > Regards, > Tapas > > On Mon, 20 Mar 2023, 17:02 Saroj Kasaju, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Thank you Mr. Garg ! >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 4:55 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I also feel more close to Actinodaphne reticulata Meisn. as per GBIF >>> <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=4176958> specimens ( >>> one >>> <https://www.gbif.org/tools/zoom/simple.html?src=//api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fmediaphoto.mnhn.fr%2Fmedia%2F1441303198529LMrNzbkxauXyBV29>, >>> two >>> <https://www.gbif.org/tools/zoom/simple.html?src=//api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fn2t.net%2Fark%3A%2F65665%2Fm38e5a0276-4972-4d2e-ae19-d881c1561f61>, >>> three >>> <https://www.gbif.org/tools/zoom/simple.html?src=//api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Fquod.lib.umich.edu%2Fcgi%2Fi%2Fimage%2Fapi%2Fimage%2Fherb00ic%3A1500468%3AMICH-V-1500468%2Ffull%2Fres%3A0%2F0%2Fnative.jpg> >>> ). >>> Looks different from Actinodaphne sikkimensis Meisn. as per efi page >>> <https://efloraofindia.com/2018/07/14/actinodaphne-sikkimensis/> and >>> GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=4176753> >>> specimens. >>> >>> On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 at 13:13, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, it mentioned Phulchoki also. However, the tree had fallen and I am >>>> not sure If I can >>>> find another tree to follow up for the flowering and fruiting ! >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 1:18 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> OK Tapas Da! >>>>> I am not Da but a junior😉! >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 1:15 PM Tapas Chakrabarty <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Saroj da, >>>>>> Would you please read our publication on Actinodaphne and point out >>>>>> where we erred? >>>>>> >>>>>> Sincere regards, >>>>>> Tapas >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 17 Mar 2023, 12:49 Saroj Kasaju, <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear Tapas Da ! >>>>>>> A. sikkimensis is not yet recorded from Kathmandu Valley, however, >>>>>>> A. reticulata is recorded in >>>>>>> many localities in the valley and particularly. Phulchoki ! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 12:46 PM Tapas Chakrabarty < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The whorled leaves and the terminal perulate buds indeed point to >>>>>>>> Actinodaphne. However, in my opinion, A. reticulata is best treated as >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> rare endemic confined to the Khasi hills in Meghalaya. I think the >>>>>>>> present >>>>>>>> images should be compared with A. sikkimensis. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Mar 2023, 12:12 Saroj Kasaju, <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Actinodaphne reticulata *Meisn. ?? Herbarium image from nearby >>>>>>>>> location. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fidentify.plantnet.org%2Fru%2Fthe-plant-list%2Fspecies%2FActinodaphne%2520longipes%2520Kosterm.%2Fdata&psig=AOvVaw2W3qn5h8fLOEwsMm-T0TOo&ust=1679121425740000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CBAQjRxqFwoTCOCW8PKs4v0CFQAAAAAdAAAAABAE >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 12:08 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yes, appears to be from lauraceae. >>>>>>>>>> Can it be some Actinodaphne >>>>>>>>>> <https://efloraofindia.com/2011/02/01/actinodaphne/> species. >>>>>>>>>> I tried as per the Checklist of Nepal >>>>>>>>>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=110&taxon_id=100442>, >>>>>>>>>> but could not find any match. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>>>>>>> From: Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 13:48 >>>>>>>>>> Subject: SK 3703 15 March 2023 >>>>>>>>>> To: efloraindia <[email protected]>, J.M. Garg < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>, Tapas Chakrabarty <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *Dear Members,Location: Kathmandu Valley, NepalDate: 11 March >>>>>>>>>> 2023Altitude: 2418m.Habitat : Wild * >>>>>>>>>> Lauraceae ?? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> With regards, >>>>>>>>>> J.M.Garg >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> With regards, >>> J.M.Garg >>> >> -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFDcBoz9omCjQkoZo2ZexYnaJmehgK7GGAkHC6QpEM90wQ%40mail.gmail.com.
