Dinesh ji, it is true that two can't be considered as synonyms according to POWO, COL and WFO, but before calling this as A. aegyptiaca, we need to know differences between the two before we decide ID of this.
On Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 11:11:26 PM UTC+5:30 Dinesh Valke wrote: > *Ammannia aegyptiaca* Willd. (not synonym of *Ammannia baccifera* L.) > > https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:552648-1#synonyms > > Regards. > Dinesh > > On Thursday, 8 June 2023 at 22:14:26 UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > >> https://www.gbif.org/species/11083499 ??? >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 6:46 PM Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> *Ammannia aegyptiaca* Willd. ... FOR VALIDATION >>> popular synonym: *Ammannia baccifera* subsp. *aegyptiaca* (Willd.) >>> Koehne >>> Waghbil, Thane, Maharashtra :: Sep 27, 2008 · 2:09 PM IST :: about 3 m >>> (10 ft) asl >>> ------------------------------ >>> [image: Ammannia aegyptiaca Willd. ... FOR VALIDATION] >>> <https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/153775546> >>> Regards. >>> Dinesh >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To view this discussion on the web, visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CABSQqC109Y3_fxX3yn_Ky5zYGx3dH_YsfC_zdN9JoPJmQ_8nPg%40mail.gmail.com >>> >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CABSQqC109Y3_fxX3yn_Ky5zYGx3dH_YsfC_zdN9JoPJmQ_8nPg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/fa8890fb-6ba6-4396-bfde-0cc5cacd8045n%40googlegroups.com.
