Suregada lanceolata.

On Thu, 15 Jun 2023, 12:03 J.M. Garg, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks, Tapas ji.
> What to finally take it as ?
>
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 23:04, Tapas Chakrabarty <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> It may be noted that the genus *Suregada *Roxb. ex Rottler exhibits
>> extra-ordinary phenological plasticity. Each species seems to be connected
>> to some other species with endless intermediated. Hence, species
>> delimitations in the genus are based on some tendencies exhibited by the
>> taxa rather than sharp discontinuities or differences.
>>
>> In India, we have three recognized species, as follows:
>>
>> *1. Suregada bifaria *(Roxb. ex Willd.) Baill., Hist. Pl. 5: 120. 1874;
>> Ramana *et al. *in Phytotaxa 221: 183. 2015. – *Gelonium bifarium *Roxb.
>> [Hort. Bengal. 73. 1814, *nom. nud.*] ex Willd., Sp. Pl., ed. 4, 4(2):
>> 831. 1806.
>>
>> *Type *(lectotype, designated by Ramana *et al., *2015): India, *Roxburgh
>> s.n. *(B-W18501-020!). Remaining original material: India, *Roxburgh
>> s.n. *(B-W10501-010!).
>>
>> *Distribution: *India (Andaman & Nicobar Islands), throughout Malesia to
>> N Australia.
>>
>> Usually recognizable by the bilocular fruits.
>>
>> *2. Suregada lanceolata *(Willd.) Kuntze, Revis. Gen. Pl. 2: 619. 1891.
>> – *Gelonium lanceolatum *Willd., Sp. Pl., ed. 4, 4(2): 832. 1806; Roxb.,
>> Hort. Bengal. 73. 1814 & Fl. Ind. 3: 831. 1832.
>>
>> *Type *India, *Klein *782 (holotype B-W18502-010, digital image!).
>>
>> Link: https://herbarium.bgbm.org/object/BW18502010
>>
>> = *Gelonium angustifolium *Müll.Arg. in DC., Prodr. 15(2): 1128. 1866. – 
>> *Suregada
>> angustifolia *(Müll.Arg.) Airy Shaw in Kew Bull. 23: 128. 1969.
>>
>> *Type *(first-step lectotype, designated by Airy Shaw, 1969): Sri Lanka,
>> Adams Peak, March 1846, *Thwaites *CP [Ceylon Plants] 252 (K).
>> Second-step lectotype (designated by Chakrabarty in Ann. Pl. Sci. 8: 3634.
>> 2019): Sri Lanka, *Thwaites *CP [Ceylon Plants] 252 (K000247072, digital
>> image!; isolectotypes G00319624, K000247073, digital images!). Additional
>> syntypes: India, Cochin, *Johnston s.n. *(K000247071, digital image!);
>> Sri Lanka, *Thwaites *CP [Ceylon Plants] 696 (G00319623, G00319625,
>> K000247068, digital images!); Sri Lanka, *Thwaites *CP [Ceylon Plants]
>> 2101 (G00319622, digital image!).
>>
>> *Distribution: *Sri Lanka and peninsular India.
>>
>> Distinguished from *S. multiflora *usually by the narrowly
>> oblong-elliptic to lanceolate-oblong or  narrowly oblong- obovate to
>> oblanceolate leave, fewer flowers per cymule and smaller fruits (usually up
>> to 1 cm in diameter). However, these characters may overlap.
>>
>> *3. Suregada multiflora *(A. Juss.) Baill., Étude Euphorb. 396. 1858. – 
>> *Gelonium
>> multiflorum *A. Juss., Euphorb. Gen. 111, t. 10, f. 31A. 1824.
>>
>> *Type *(lectotype, designated by Chakrabarty in Ann. Pl. Sci. 8: 3633.
>> 2019): [icon] in A. Juss., Euphorb. Gen. 111, t. 10, f. 31A. 1824.
>>
>> = *Gelonium fasciculatum *Roxb. [Hort. Bengal. 73. 1814, *nom. nud. *(as
>> *fascuculatum*)] Fl. Ind. 3: 832. 1832.
>>
>> *Type *(lectotype, designated by Chakrabarty in Ann. Pl. Sci. 8: 3633.
>> 2019):  Without locality (presumably India), *No collector s.n. *[7891]
>> (K001128695, digital image!). Remaining original material: Icones
>> Roxburghianae, No. 124 (CAL!, K, image!).
>>
>>  *Distribution: *India, Bangladesh, Myanmar, China, Laos, Vietnam,
>> Thailand, Malaysia, Sumatra, Celebes and Lesser Sunda Islands.
>>
>> See differences from *S. lanceolata *as given above.
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 4:54 PM nadeem waqif <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/kew-198576
>>>
>>> the plant list claims Suregada augustifolia is a synomyn of Suregada
>>> lanceolata, which is the accepted name. maybe bsi wants to go with
>>> augustifolia for some reason.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 3, 2023, 17:06 J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Keys from BSI Flora of India
>>>> <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/taxonList.action?id=177&type=3>
>>>> as given below are creating some doubt about it being *Suregada
>>>> lanceolata*. Maybe Tapas ji can clarify further.
>>>> 1a. Leaves obovate or oblanceolate, sharply acuminate at apex, up to 15
>>>> cm long; flowers small, few in fascicles; fruits smooth, deeply lobed,
>>>> keeled on lobes, 7 - 10 mm in diam. 1. *Suregada angustifolia
>>>> <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/taxonList.action?id=350&type=4>*
>>>> b. Leaves elliptic to oblong-elliptic, rounded or obtuse at apex,
>>>> entire, up to 25 cm long; flowers rather large, many in cymes or clusters;
>>>> fruits rough, obscurely lobed, 12 - 15 mm in diam. 2. *Suregada
>>>> multiflora
>>>> <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/taxonList.action?id=352&type=4>*
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>> From: Nadeem Waqif <[email protected]>
>>>> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 at 11:18
>>>> Subject: [efloraofindia:204092] Bush for ID Tiruvannamalei, Tamil Nadu
>>>> NAW-OCT-17
>>>> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kindly identify this bush photographed at the herbal garden,
>>>> Tiruvannamalei, Tamil Nadu in September 2014.
>>>>
>>>> Height of bush about 2 metres. Leaves about 8 to 10 cms. long.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> With regards,
>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>
>>>
>
> --
> With regards,
> J.M.Garg
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"eFloraofIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAKFjQVRZ2qSZ4Us6V4KDKRDuvPhtQQ3LfTpKEzkQQa%2BRq8ChKQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to