Better to follow IPNI when in doubt (for a layman like me):
https://www.ipni.org/n/60468539-2 (*Cynoglossum zeylanicum* (Sw. ex Lehm.)
Thunb. ex Brand, Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 13(no. 381-382): 546 (1915).)

On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 12:40, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> wrote:

> efi : *Cynoglossum zeylanicum* (Lehm.) Brand
> FoI : *Cynoglossum zeylanicum *(Vahl) Thunb. ex Lehm.
> efloraNepal : *Cynoglossum zeylanicu**m* (Vahl ex Hornem.) Thunb. ex Lehm.
> Latest book from Nepal, Plants of Nepal : *Cynoglossum furcatum *Wall.*
> Syn :*  *Cynoglossum zeylanicu**m *auct. non. (Sw. ex Lehm.) Thunb. ex
> Lehm.(209)
> POWO : *Cynoglossum zeylanicum* (Sw. ex Lehm.) Thunb. ex Brand
> GBIF : *Rochelia zeylanica *(Vahl) Roem. & Schult.
> CoL : *Rochelia zeylanica* (Sw. ex Lehm.) Roem. & Schult.  Syn *Cynoglossum
> zeylanicum* (Sw. ex Lehm.) Thunb. ex Brand
> WFO : *Cynoglossum zeylanicum* (Sw. ex Lehm.) Thunb. ex Brand
>
> Thank you.
>
> Saroj Kasaju
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 10:18 AM Mahadeswara <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> In my view Dr GurucharanSinghi sir  who is practicing taxonomy as his
>> career  will be the proper person to clarify  the naming game of plants
>> today !!!
>>
>> On Friday, August 4, 2023 at 10:00:53 AM UTC+5:30 Mahadeswara wrote:
>>
>>> Names with authority are valid :
>>> As per POWO -*  Cynoglossum zeylanicum* (Sw. ex Lehm.) Thunb. ex Brand
>>> https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:60468539-2
>>>
>>> *Cynoglossum zeylanicum* Wight <https://ipni.org/a/11658-1> ex Wall.
>>> <https://ipni.org/a/12990-1>  as per  International plants name index
>>> :  https://ipni.org/n/115325-1
>>> I think  people are following different  names .   I lost track of the
>>> lATEST RULES / GUIDELINES  ON TAXONOMIC NOMENCLATURE, THOUGH i  PRACTICED
>>> TAXONOMY AS A TAXONOMIST,   IN THE BEGINNING OF MY RESEARCH CAREER.
>>> sWITCHED OVER TO OTHER FIELDS  AS PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE nATIONAL
>>> LABORATORY WHERE I COMPLETED MY  CAREER .
>>> On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 11:47:59 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Kasaju wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can someone give the correct accepted name for the above sp.?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> Saroj Kasaju
>>>>
>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "eFloraofIndia" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/869f9ce7-8139-43b2-b8da-a8e13c4a1208n%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/869f9ce7-8139-43b2-b8da-a8e13c4a1208n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
With regards,
J.M.Garg

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"eFloraofIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFAOpnUo3bbexj5kkdbp4zrcOVG_rrfGOYmgRTfZMSQOEw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to