I think ray florets are more closer to *Myriactis wallichii* in shape rather than those of *M.wightii*.
On Sat, 19 Aug 2023 at 15:29, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > Garg ji and Tabish ji, I think it would be logical to place it under M. > javanica, following BSI Flora and COL. Larger heads are very distinctive > > > > > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. > https://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ > > > On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 3:04 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, Tabish ji, >> Pink flowered images of Thingnam ji at *Myriactis wightii *in FOI >> <http://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Wight's%20Myriactis.html> >> (attaching >> the images for more clarity) are more likely to be *Myriactis wallichii* as >> per keys in BSI Flora of India >> <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/taxonList.action?id=4555&type=3> >> and FoC >> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=121445>. >> POWO >> <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77232422-1> >> mentions *M.javanica* as a syn. of *M.wightii*. >> Pl. check. >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFCCcWZ%2B15i3_5tadj3E3LByK3caT_JpB5znNwhtoqquWw%40mail.gmail.com.
