Yes Garg ji.

On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 3:40:56 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote:

> Taking it as *Urtica himalayensis* Kunth & Bouché (syn: Urtica mairei 
> var. oblongifolia C.J.Chen; Urtica zayuensis C.J.Chen) as per discussions 
> at A relook at our specimens of Urtica parviflora 
> <https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/gotKtuH0Zd0>.
> Thanks, Tabish ji, for pointing out.   
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, 7 December, 2009 at 9:46:58 pm UTC+5:30
> Subject: Urtica ardens from Manali Hp
> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>, Flowers of 
> India <[email protected]>
>
>
> Sending Urtica ardens Link (syn: U. parviflora Roxb.)  from Manali, HP 
> Photographed in October, 2009
>
> differs from U. dioica in connate stipules.
>
> -- 
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"eFloraofIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/604a31f5-6fb8-4e39-a827-7ef2ce1cdeabn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to