Thanks, Tabish ji. Than it appears close. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Sat, 23 Dec, 2023, 21:18 Tabish, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Garg ji, > Thanks for pointing it out. There appears to be a contradiction between > the key and the description. The description of Duhaldea simonsii in the > same paper clearly says "Ray florets yellow, ligulate, ligules long." (page > 268). > Tabish > ------------------------------------------- > <http://www.flowersofindia.net>www.flowersofindia.net > The waterhole of flower lovers > > > On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 3:49 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> But the keys in the paper says that ray florets are white (here these >> are yellow) >> One GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/species/3126677> specimen >> <https://www.gbif.org/tools/zoom/simple.html?src=//api.gbif.org/v1/image/cache/occurrence/912225225/media/fd484dedc5297baeaf45ea1251321fe6> >> can be seen. >> >> On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 at 23:24, Tabish <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> From the paper on researchgate, *Duhaldea simonsii* seems closer to our >>> plant. Rounded base of the leaves is characteristic of this species and the >>> flowers have yellow ray florets, and are borne in few-flowered corymbs. >>> Unfortunately no images are available to compare. >>> Tabish >>> ------------------------------------------- >>> <http://www.flowersofindia.net>www.flowersofindia.net >>> The waterhole of flower lovers >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 4:44 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I am having doubts about its id as *Duhaldea eupatorioides *as per >>>> specimens at POWO >>>> <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:962577-1> >>>> and GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=3126675> >>>> specimens (one >>>> <https://www.gbif.org/tools/zoom/simple.html?src=//api.gbif.org/v1/image/cache/occurrence/912225232/media/d1b7e5cff0661b8682f71e6ddddb099c>, >>>> two >>>> <https://www.gbif.org/tools/zoom/simple.html?src=//api.gbif.org/v1/image/cache/occurrence/2610906408/media/bf2aed83c3e07ac490db64dacc282bc3> >>>> and three >>>> <https://www.gbif.org/tools/zoom/simple.html?src=//api.gbif.org/v1/image/cache/occurrence/2610884406/media/22359f75b23e6eec8f5c778ac69bbe7b>). >>>> Also the image at ResearchGate >>>> <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342591403_The_genus_Duhaldea_Asteraceae_in_India> >>>> looks different. >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>> From: Tabish <[email protected]> >>>> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 14:48 >>>> Subject: [efloraofindia:297352] Asteraceae from Maipur TQ-mu01 >>>> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> >>>> A robust looking herb with Yellow flowers >>>> Location: Shirui hill, Ukhrul, Manipur. Altitude: 1500-2500 >>>> Looks like from Aster family >>>> Please identify >>>> Tabish >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> With regards, >>>> J.M.Garg >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFAr4qCMn85xq0%2B04CKG6JBaMGfXk_PB2iFYJSwUiA7Lzg%40mail.gmail.com.
