Thanks a lot, Tapas ji. I think there is some mistakes in the specimens attached in POWO: https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:340219-1 https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:340190-1
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 at 17:53, Tapas Chakrabarty <[email protected]> wrote: > Bridelia retusa. > > On Thu, 8 Feb 2024, 17:51 J.M. Garg, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> To me appears more closer to images at >> https://efloraofindia.com/2011/02/11/bridelia-retusa/ >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: J.M. Garg <[email protected]> >> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 10:59 >> Subject: Fwd: Phyllanthaceae: Bridelia montana Willd. >> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]> >> Cc: John Parrotta <[email protected]> >> >> >> Thanks a lot, John ji. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: John Parrotta <[email protected]> >> Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 at 22:25 >> Subject: Phyllanthaceae: Bridelia montana Willd. >> To: J.M. Garg <[email protected]> >> >> >> *synonym: *Bridelia hamiltoniana Wall. ex Müll.Arg. >> >> *location/date (all):* Chilenahalli, Bangalore Distr., Karnataka, July >> 1997 >> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFBiY7gNjOZAPsXEBR3AB9YM5d8S-YySQ6oUCGfWfatuJA%40mail.gmail.com.
