---------- Forwarded message --------- From: John Parrotta <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 21:55 Subject: Re: Poaceae: Tragus racemosus (L.) All. To: J.M. Garg <[email protected]> Cc: efloraofindia <[email protected]>
Dear Manoj ji, Many thanks for this very interesting info and history! Best wishes, John On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:41 AM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks a lot, Manoj ji > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Manoj Chandran > Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 20:27 > Subject: Re: Poaceae: Tragus racemosus (L.) All. > To: J.M. Garg <[email protected]> > > > Dear Sirs, > The whole genus is a taxonomic mystery and a play of names by various > authors. There is no one opinion. There are so many intermediate types and > so, it is not right to separate these into different species. > So, in the broad sense, the names T.racemosus and T.biflorus is used for > many of the described species. T.mongolorum was also placed as a synonym of > T.berteronianus by Anton in "The genus Tragus (Gramineae)" (Kew Bulletin > 36(1)). > So, basically, it is ok to place it under T.racemosus (L.) All. , which is > the oldest one based on the basionym Cenchrus racemosus L. in species > plantarum > No idea why POWO has not shown India in its distribution map. > Regards... > Manoj > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 5:52 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, Manoj ji, >> Awaiting your views pl. >> > >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: J.M. Garg <[email protected]> >> Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 14:49 >> Subject: Re: Poaceae: Tragus racemosus (L.) All. >> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]> >> Cc: John Parrotta <[email protected]> >> >> >> Correct wording should be: >> It does not have distribution in India as per POWO >> <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:1084305-2>. >> Can it be *Tragus mongolorum* Ohwi: >> https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:424420-1 >> https://efloraofindia.com/2011/04/03/tragus-roxburghii/? >> >> On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 13:23, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It does have distribution in India as per POWO >>> <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:1084305-2>. >>> Can it be *Tragus mongolorum* Ohwi: >>> https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:424420-1 >>> https://efloraofindia.com/2011/04/03/tragus-roxburghii/? >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> From: J.M. Garg <[email protected]> >>> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 11:55 >>> Subject: Fwd: Poaceae: Tragus racemosus (L.) All. >>> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]> >>> Cc: John Parrotta <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> Thanks a lot, John ji. >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> From: John Parrotta <[email protected]> >>> Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 at 23:06 >>> Subject: Poaceae: Tragus racemosus (L.) All. >>> To: J.M. Garg <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> *synonym: *Tragus biflorus Schult. >>> >>> *location/date:* Chotannahalli, Tumkur Dist., Karnataka, July 1997 >>> >>> >>> -- >>> With regards, >>> J.M.Garg >>> >>> >>> -- >>> With regards, >>> J.M.Garg >>> >> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > > > -- > With regards, > J.M.Garg > -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFDcPP72LbSev1vgX1OHdSkUd9T3rZuFasQjr5ze0oc%2BKQ%40mail.gmail.com.
