Yes, I understand. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:55 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > In fact, Asteraceae > <https://efloraofindia.com/category/species/a-l-d0/ar/asteraceae/> is > more scientifically arranged, being a very large family. > Pl. see. > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 12:35, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Still it will be better to keep large genera like Alysicarpus, Bauhnia, >> Crotalria, Indigo etc.out it (for the sake of non updation of family pages >> when such large genus pages are updated etc., reducing the no. of family >> pages like Fabaceae 1, Fabaceae 2 etc. to the bare minimum). Also we can >> explore possibility of makinging Subfamily pages etc. as we have done in >> Asteraceae >> <https://efloraofindia.com/category/species/a-l-d0/ar/asteraceae/> (But >> that requires a lot of time and quite a bit of overhauling). >> >> On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 12:07, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> We can enlist alphabetically all genus. >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Saroj Kasaju >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:18 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, that is possible on the current Wordpress site. >>>> I will think of it in future, as and when time permits after completing >>>> comparative images work on Poaceae (ongoing) and Orchidaceae (not taken up >>>> as yet). >>>> >>>> On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 11:54, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Can we make multiple pages like Fabaceae 1,2 3 ? >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 11:59 AM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yes, not included. >>>>>> If I include all for such a large family, it will become really >>>>>> difficult to even load the page. >>>>>> Even with a good speed, sometimes it becomes really difficult to load >>>>>> the existing page. >>>>>> This I have done for lots of big families. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 11:34, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear Mr. Garg, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Isn't all genera should be included in the family page, isn't it ? >>>>>>> It would have been easy to browse. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> With regards, >>>>>> J.M.Garg >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> With regards, >>>> J.M.Garg >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > > > -- > With regards, > J.M.Garg > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAEf%3DytRvM2jLPnWSUwpYGK3%2BGAj8j2JHHR3OHPwO-CbifFz1AA%40mail.gmail.com.
