Dinesh ji, Ridges are there, but seen very fine at this ripe stage. See images of S.heterophylla fruits to differentiate. S.amplexicaulis fruit is totally different. See efi site and the publication. -- With regards, J. M. Garg
On Tue, 17 Sep, 2024, 10:35 Dinesh Valke, <[email protected]> wrote: > Garg ji, I see the fruits without angles or ridges, at least not > pronounced enough. > Would this not be *amplexicaulis* ? > > Regards. > Dinesh > > On Saturday 14 September 2024 at 16:48:49 UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > >> Taking it as *Solena umbellata* (Willd.) W.J. de Wilde & Duyfjes as no >> distribution for *Solena heterophylla *Lour. subsp. *heterophylla *as >> per Review of the Genus Solena (Cucurbitaceae) >> <http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/blumea/2004/00000049/00000001/art00004> >> Authors*: *Wilde, W.J.J.O. De; Duyfjes, B.E.E. Source*:* Blumea – >> Biodiversity, Evolution and Biogeography of Plants, Volume 49, Number 1, >> May 2004 , pp. 69-81(13). >> Also as there are ridges on the fruit, it should be *Solena umbellata* >> (Willd.) >> W.J. de Wilde & Duyfjes. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: JM Garg <[email protected]> >> Date: Saturday 14 September, 2024 at 4:39:59 pm UTC+5:30 >> Subject: Fwd: Solena amplexicaulis fruiting >> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]>, [email protected] < >> [email protected]> >> >> >> Taking it as *Solena umbellata* (Willd.) W.J. de Wilde & Duyfjes as no >> distribution for *Solena heterophylla *Lour. subsp. *heterophylla *as >> per Review of the Genus Solena (Cucurbitaceae) >> <http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/blumea/2004/00000049/00000001/art00004> >> Authors*: *Wilde, W.J.J.O. De; Duyfjes, B.E.E. Source*:* Blumea – >> Biodiversity, Evolution and Biogeography of Plants, Volume 49, Number 1, >> May 2004 , pp. 69-81(13) >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: JM Garg <[email protected]> >> Date: Monday 8 December, 2014 at 4:59:50 pm UTC+5:30 >> Subject: Fwd: Solena amplexicaulis fruiting >> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]>, [email protected] < >> [email protected]> >> >> >> I think it should be* Solena heterophylla *Lour. as per >> DeWilde_Solena_Blumea2004 (1).pdf >> >> On Sunday, October 10, 2010 11:15:45 PM UTC+5:30, Neil wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Solena amplexicaulis [Gometi] was fruiting at my farm at Shahapur today. >> Sending a few photographs. >> With regards, >> Neil Soares. >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "eFloraofIndia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/c79f09ed-d59b-49b7-b8e8-19a7374573cbn%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/c79f09ed-d59b-49b7-b8e8-19a7374573cbn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFDRidnf11mgEFMr%2BJggp9-hD8aC29PHs%3DYa2obpueqahA%40mail.gmail.com.
