-- With regards, J. M. Garg ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: M Sawmliana <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 5 Dec, 2024, 11:55 Subject: Re: Is it Cinnamomum aromaticum ? To: J.M. Garg <[email protected]>
The bark is aromatic. The roots which also aromatic and pungent, used to collect by local people. The Mizo name for this tree is Thakthing. This tree was identified by some people as Cinnamomum verum. On Thu, 5 Dec, 2024, 11:38 am J.M. Garg, <[email protected]> wrote: > If bark is aromatic than it may be this species (Cinnamomum burmanni) as > per > http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242445060 > https://tropical.theferns.info/viewtropical.php?id=Cinnamomum+burmannii > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinnamomum_burmanni > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Cinnamomum_burmanni > > https://sys01.lib.hkbu.edu.hk/cmed/mpid/detail.php?herb_id=D00868&lang=eng&sort=name_eng > > https://www.sunshine-seeds.de/product_info.php?products_id=44775&language=en > > I could not find that bark of Cinnamomum impressinervium is aromatic as > per > > https://tropical.theferns.info/viewtropical.php?id=Cinnamomum+impressinervium > > https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379212338_Cinnamomum_impressinervium_meisn_antioxidant_and_antimicrobial_activities > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 at 14:32, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J. M. Garg >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: M Sawmliana <[email protected]> >> Date: Wed, 13 Nov, 2024, 20:15 >> Subject: Re: Is it Cinnamomum aromaticum ? >> To: J.M. Garg <[email protected]> >> >> >> Bark aromatic. Both wild and cultivated. >> >> On Wed, 13 Nov, 2024, 2:26 pm M Sawmliana, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Mon, 11 Nov, 2024, 5:31 pm M Sawmliana, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Nobody tell me sir. >>>> >>>> On Mon, 11 Nov, 2024, 11:46 am J.M. Garg, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Who told you ? >>>>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>> From: M Sawmliana <[email protected]> >>>>> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 at 10:51 >>>>> Subject: Re: Is it Cinnamomum aromaticum ? >>>>> To: JM Garg <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cinnamomum burmanni I think >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 11 Nov, 2024, 8:56 am M Sawmliana, <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Is this Cinnamomum impressinervium ? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 10 Nov, 2024, 5:30 pm JM Garg, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> This is same as at MS,Oct.,2024/04 Cinnamomum sp. for id >>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/lkuh0TxuFt4> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>>>> From: [email protected] <[email protected]> >>>>>>> Date: Thursday 20 March, 2014 at 2:26:42 pm UTC+5:30 >>>>>>> Subject: Is it Cinnamomum aromaticum ? >>>>>>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Date* : 25-05-2012. *Habitat* : Wild.* Habit* : Medium sized >>>>>>> evergreen tree with aromatic leaveas (M.Sawmliana) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> With regards, >>>>> J.M.Garg >>>>> >>>> > > -- > With regards, > J.M.Garg > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFD6YjK2HH6FAy3eDHWkz5CFcRCgJXJDAyyT19_2DySY%2BQ%40mail.gmail.com.
