Ok, Tabish ji. On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 at 14:40, Tabish <[email protected]> wrote:
> The flower images mentioned in my post forwarded below, should be of Vicoa > cernua (Syn: *Pentanema cernuum)* only, as per the following paper > https://www.biotaxa.org/Phytotaxa/article/view/phytotaxa.514.3.7 > As per this paper, *Vicoa gokhalei* is a synonym of *Vicoa cernua*. The > species which the authors, describing Vicoa gokhale, considered to be Vicoa > cernua (the one with virtually invisible ray florets) is now described as a > new species *Vico sahyadrica*. > Tabish > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Tabish <Unknown> > Date: Sunday, November 22, 2020 at 6:16:02 PM UTC+5:30 > Subject: Vicoa gokhalei > To: efloraofindia <Unknown> > > > The flower images posted as *Pentanema cernuum* (which is now *Vicoa > cernua*) by Dinesh Valke > <https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/U9mW9XxcEm4>, Neha Singh > <https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/kMN7c3HzhwI> and Alka Khare > <https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/ljLLtSmyjuc> should actually > be of a newly described species > *Vicoa gokhalei* Gosavi, Madhav, Chandore & S.R.Yadav > I am attaching a page from the 2020 paper describing the species. Vicoa > cernua has very small ray-florets. The flowers with long ray-florets should > be of Vicoa gokhalei > Tabish > -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFDv2FUTksrwpPwETJPk_q4EY7mh7SQJT2oyHzhajE-v1Q%40mail.gmail.com.
