Also Rohdea nepalensis (Raf.) N.Tanaka does not have distribution as per https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77114985-1 and Fora of Penisular India.
On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 at 15:48, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess that sp. is found only in eastern India. > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 at 15:47, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think it looks different from images at >> https://efloraofindia.com/2018/04/13/rohdea-nepalensis/ >> Can it be >> https://efloraofindia.com/2023/01/01/rohdea-wattii/? >> >> On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 at 15:43, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Looks like *Rohdea nepalensis *(Raf.) N.Tanaka >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Saroj Kasaju >>> >>> On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 at 15:41, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Posting again as a lot of posts got clubbed in the same thread due to >>>> same subject >>>> <https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/7P85VWkMiM0/m/n-bh9fGYAwAJ> by >>>> Prabhat ji >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> With regards, >>> J.M.Garg >>> >> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > > > -- > With regards, > J.M.Garg > -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFD1GtiADD8b1%2Bq0SgV5uEHOsdAa0NRTYjY%3DbF7DQ_dqxg%40mail.gmail.com.
