Many many thanks, Garg ji, for suggesting the ID. Hopefully Sushant puts his thoughts; will update my notes accordingly. Regards. Dinesh
On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 1:08 PM JM Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it may be *Blumea eriantha* only > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, 14 June 2023 at 8:43:05 pm UTC+5:30 > Subject: FOR VALIDATION :: Blumea lacera (Burm.f.) DC. :: Waghbil, Thane > :: Mar 2, 2008 · JUN23 DV268 > To: efloraofindia <[email protected]> > > > *Blumea lacera* (Burm.f.) DC. ... FOR VALIDATION > Waghbil, Thane :: Mar 2, 2008 · 4:28 PM IST :: about 3 m (10 ft) asl > ------------------------------ > Validating / identifying this Blumea may get challenging due to lack of > leaf photos. > [image: Blumea lacera (Burm.f.) DC. ... FOR VALIDATION] > <https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/152947475> > [image: Blumea lacera (Burm.f.) DC. ... FOR VALIDATION] > <https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/152947475> > [image: Blumea lacera (Burm.f.) DC. ... FOR VALIDATION] > <https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/152947475> > [image: Blumea lacera (Burm.f.) DC. ... FOR VALIDATION] > <https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/152947475> > Regards. > Dinesh > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CABSQqC2XR21UaLBazG7j0cFmuho-J4McVy6tvcZNz32aiWYJJw%40mail.gmail.com.
