Thank you Rashida ji, the key brings in more food for thought. I am
yet to see E. pubescens and E. mysorensis. Can you pls provide
locations where they can be searched? 'Orchids of Bombay' gives E.
pubescens Wight as syn of E. mysorensis Lindl. Regards, Shrikant.

On Oct 4, 5:38 am, shrikant ingalhalikar <le...@rediffmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you Rashida ji for a confirmation. I have been following 'The
> Orchids of Bombay' by Santapau Kapadia for ID. Could you pls give a
> similar dichotomous key for Eria genus to compare.(Sorry, I don't have
> a copy of flora of Maha) Regards, Shrikant
>
> On Oct 2, 3:21 pm, Rashida Atthar <atthar.rash...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > These tiny orchids -EriaconrardiiAlmeida  were seen last week at Amboli,
> > Maharashtra.  As Dr. Almeida explained this was given an incorrrect
> >  description as Eris dalzellii Lindl, type of Dalzellii was different, hence
> > the new name after  the director for a brief period of Blatter herbarium.  A
> > very interesting explanation is available in Dr. Almeida's flora of Mah.Vvol
> > V -A pg 42/43.
>
> > regards,
> > Rashida.
>
> >  EriaconrardiiAlmeida at Amboli.JPG
> > 664KViewDownload
>
> >  EriaconrardiiAlmeida.JPG
> > 409KViewDownload
>
> >  Eriaconrardiion the bark of Anjan tree.JPG
> > 578KViewDownload
>
> >  Erias at Amboli.JPG
> > 524KViewDownload- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to