Dear Tanay Ji, I know this is not a sign for ID, but I said probably
seen in Mappia foetida.
Almost 90% of the photoes on your thread also showing this feature.
Only tender leaves are not showing. Also one thing is that Branches
are having small white dotts which may be absent in Pavetta. Pavetta
leaf held against sunlight shows bacterial glands. Which are absent in
Mappia foetida.
Thanx.
Dr.Kadus Arvind,Pune.
On Oct 6, 11:34 am, Navendu <[email protected]> wrote:
> the leaves are clustered at the end of the branches and are not
> opposite, so it should be Mappia foetida.
>
> navendu
>
> On Oct 5, 11:54 pm, tanay bose <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Dear Arvind Ji,
> > I think your plant is Nothapodytes nimmoniana but having holes in the leaves
> > is not diagonistic to this plant. Theseholes may be dure to insect or fungal
> > invasion! Kindly check couple of more photos from the link provided below,
> > an intact plant doesn't have these
> > holes.http://www.biotik.org/india/species/n/nothnimm/nothnimm_en.html
> > Regards
> > Tanay
>
> > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:54 PM, arvind kadus
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > I think this is Nothapodytes nimmoniana i.e. Narakya.
> > > Leaves are with tiny holes, which probably seen in Narakya only.
> > > Pavetta leaf for comparison.
> > > Dr.Kadus Arvind,Pune.
>
> > --
> > *Tanay Bose*
> > Research Assistant & Teaching Assistant.
> > Department of Botany.
> > University of British Columbia .
> > 3529-6270 University Blvd.
> > Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z4 (Canada)
> > Phone: 778-323-4036 (Mobile)
> > 604-822-2019 (Lab)
> > [email protected] Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
