Sorry, reversed by mistake. Correct wording should be: If we follow keys in Flora of China, than it should be *Shuteria involucrata*: http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=130279 http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=117008&flora_id=2 http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=116339&flora_id=2
On Sun, 15 Mar 2026 at 13:07, JM Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > If we follow keys in Flora of China, than it should be *Shuteria vestita*: > http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=130279 > http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=117008&flora_id=2 > http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=116339&flora_id=2 > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Anurag N. Sharma <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, 11 November 2015 at 12:31:21 pm UTC+5:30 > Subject: ANNOV22/22 Shuteria involucrata (Wall.) Wight & Arn. (Please > validate) > To: efloraofindia <[email protected]> > > > Family: Fabaceae > Date: 1st November 2014 > Place: Mussoorie, Uttarakhand > Habit: Climber > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "eFloraofIndia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/2eea0d8d-82d9-4f31-8123-868163ef2c2dn%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/2eea0d8d-82d9-4f31-8123-868163ef2c2dn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- With regards, J.M.Garg, https://efloraofindia.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFA%3DXQwE-UKHV7ofO9x7v1MwZUAy3JKOa%2BzgpfE468nh6Q%40mail.gmail.com.
