Yes, I also agree -- Dr. Gurcharan Singh Retired Associate Professor SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Tabish <[email protected]> wrote: > Lindelofia stylosa is my view too. > - Tabish > > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Sorry, I think I am wrong. Looks more close to Lindelofia stylosa. > > Pankaj > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> how about Pseudomertensia echioides > >> Pankaj > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:21 PM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise please. > >>> > >>> Some earlier relevant feedback: > >>> > >>> “This would be fruiting Primula macrophylla. Regards, Shrikant” > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> “Rather a member of Boraginaceae, perhaps Pseudomertensia parviflora, > >>> exserted stamens are characteristic > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh” > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> “Singh Sir, pic 7b shows calyx and style. There is no corolla. Besides > >>> the flowers (fallen) are in umbel and not scorpioid as in > >>> Boraginaceae. Pls have a look again. Regards, Shrikant” > >>> > >>> "Shrikant ji > >>> But perhaps you did not notice four nutlets at the base of style in 7b. > >>> Also Primula macrophylla (rather most Primulas) has basal rosette of > leaves > >>> and not cauline leaves like we see in 7a. Also the leaf arrangement, > leaf > >>> surface and inflorescence is typical of Boraginaceae. > >>> http://www.primulaworld.com/PWWeb/gallery/macrophylla.html > >>> -- > >>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh" > >>> > >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >>> From: Nudrat Sayed <[email protected]> > >>> Date: 22 September 2010 12:15 > >>> Subject: [efloraofindia:47916] ID required for Leh Flwrs 7a&7b > >>> To: indiantreepix <[email protected]> > >>> > >>> > >>> Please identify. By any chance does this plant belong to genus > Aconitum > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Regards > >>> Dr. Sayed Nudrat Zawar > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> With regards, > >>> J.M.Garg ([email protected]) > >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1 > >>> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna' > >>> The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a thousand species > & > >>> eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged > >>> alphabetically & place-wise): > >>> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg. You can also use > them > >>> for free as per liberal licensing conditions attached with each image. > >>> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian > Flora, > >>> please visit/ join our Google e-group- > >>> Efloraofindia:http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix (more > than 1400 > >>> members & 50,000 messages on 10/10/10 & with a database of around 4100 > >>> species on 31/8/10) > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> *********************************************** > >> "TAXONOMISTS GETTING EXTINCT AND SPECIES DATA DEFICIENT !!" > >> > >> > >> Pankaj Kumar Ph.D. (Orchidaceae) > >> Research Associate > >> Greater Kailash Sacred Landscape Project > >> Department of Habitat Ecology > >> Wildlife Institute of India > >> Post Box # 18 > >> Dehradun - 248001, India > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > *********************************************** > > "TAXONOMISTS GETTING EXTINCT AND SPECIES DATA DEFICIENT !!" > > > > > > Pankaj Kumar Ph.D. (Orchidaceae) > > Research Associate > > Greater Kailash Sacred Landscape Project > > Department of Habitat Ecology > > Wildlife Institute of India > > Post Box # 18 > > Dehradun - 248001, India > > > > > > -- >
