I fully agree with Tabish sir, you really have very sharp observations sir....
Two pics belong to different plants. First one is of course an Impatiens, most probably Impatiens dolichoceras or something close. Second pic is from family Zingiberaceae most likely to be Globba. The flowers are drenched in water so they are damaged. Pankaj On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Tabish <[email protected]> wrote: > Second pic is a different flower - it is not an Impatiens at all. > - Tabish > > On Oct 28, 11:57 pm, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >> Resurfacing again for ID >> >> -- >> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >> Retired Associate Professor >> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Satish Phadke <[email protected]> >> Date: Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:22 AM >> Subject: [efloraofindia:50428] Plant for ID UP 1 >> To: indiantreepix <[email protected]> >> >> fromushaprabha page <[email protected]> to >> [email protected] >> date30 September 2010 15:22 subject[efloraofindia:48946] id pl. mailing list >> <indiantreepix.googlegroups.com> Filter messages from this mailing list >> mailed-bygooglegroups.com Signed bygooglegroups.com unsubscribeUnsubscribe >> from this mailing list >> hide details 30 Sep (11 days ago) >> >> Further id of the impatiens in the Eagle nest sanct. >> >> >> >> UP2.JPG >> 28KViewDownload >> >> UP1.JPG >> 89KViewDownload -- *********************************************** "TAXONOMISTS GETTING EXTINCT AND SPECIES DATA DEFICIENT !!" Pankaj Kumar Ph.D. (Orchidaceae) Research Associate Greater Kailash Sacred Landscape Project Department of Habitat Ecology Wildlife Institute of India Post Box # 18 Dehradun - 248001, India
