Seeing the images on this page
  http://flowers.la.coocan.jp/Polygonaceae/Persicaria%20pubescens.htm
Persicaria pubescens seems to be the right ID!
  - Tabish

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Ritesh Kumar Choudhary
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I suppose this plant to be Persicaria pubescens (Blume) H. Hara. A close
> scrutiny of the perianth will confirm the identity which should be glandular
> punctate.
>
> Regards,
> Ritesh.
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:30 PM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise pl.
>> Earlier relevant feedback:
>> “Now correctly placed as Persicaria posumbu (Buch.-Ham.ex D. Don) H. Gross
>> (syn: Polygonum posumbu Buch.-Ham. ex D. Don; P. cespitosum Blume;
>> Persicaria cespitosum (Blume) Hara).
>> --
>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh”
>>
>> “Persicaria posumbu flowers are supposed to be short-stalked, but the
>> flowers in your picture are on long slender stalks.
>>  - Tabish”
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Vijayasankar <[email protected]>
>> Date: 10 September 2010 09:30
>> Subject: [efloraofindia:47041] Flora of Manipur: Polygonum posumbi
>> To: indiatreepix <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>> Polygonum posumbi from Manipur.
>> With regards
>>
>> Vijayasankar
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With regards,
>> J.M.Garg ([email protected])
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1
>> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
>> The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a thousand species &
>> eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged
>> alphabetically & place-wise):
>> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg. You can also use them
>> for free as per liberal licensing conditions attached with each image.
>> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora,
>> please visit/ join our Google e-group-
>> Efloraofindia:http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix (more than 1420
>> members & 52,000 messages on 26/10/10 & with a database of around 4200
>> species on 30/9/10)
>>
>
>
>
> -
>

Reply via email to