Yes, the leaves are distinctive, like that of Blueberry
  http://www.naturephoto-cz.eu/vaccinium-myrtillus-picture-784.html
The species name vaccinifolia means just that. According to GRIN, the
currently accepted name is Bistorta vaccinifolia.
   - Tabish

On Nov 18, 11:58 am, Ritesh Choudhary <ritesh....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Gurucharan sir,
>
> Happy to take your wicket again!! Its Polygonum vacciniifolium Wall.
> ex Meissn.(=Bistorta vacciniifolia).
>
> Best regards,
> Ritesh.
>
> On Nov 18, 3:30 pm, Gurcharan Singh <singh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think it is the same.
>
> > --
> > Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> > Retired  Associate Professor
> > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> > Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:42 PM, J.M. Garg <jmga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Wild Herb captured on 13/8/10 during the trek from Ghangaria (around
> > > 11,000 ft.) to Hemkunt Sahib (around 14000 ft.).
> > > Leaves looked different in both my postings earlier identified as 
> > > Polygonum
> > > affine (=Bistorta affinis).
> > > Leaves are different here also from Polygonum affine (=Bistorta affinis).
> > > --
> > > With regards,
> > > J.M.Garg (jmga...@gmail.com)
> > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1
> > > 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
> > > The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a *thousand species* &
> > > eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged
> > > alphabetically & place-wise):
> > >http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg. You can also use them
> > > for free as per liberal licensing conditions attached with each image.
> > > For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora,
> > > please visit/ join our Google e-group- Efloraofindia:
> > >http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix(morethan 1420 members &
> > > 52,000 messages on 26/10/10 & with a database of around 4200 species on
> > > 30/9/10)

Reply via email to