Many thanks Ron for the confirmation. Regards.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Ron_Convolvulaceae <[email protected]>wrote: > > > On Nov 23, 9:11 am, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... correct you are Parjanya ji, ... couple of days back, even Prashant > > (Awale) also doubted this to be *Ipomoea arachnosperma*. > > Thus, it must be *Ipomoea nil* ... many thanks to both of you !!! > > > > Regards. > > > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Parjanya guru <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > Nice pictures Dinesh jee..!!! > > > .. By the way, I hope the term- ARACHNOSPERMA reffers to the Stamens, > > > resembling a spider.....I hope so.... > > > Is it the case here.?? > > > ........A curios mind's question.. ha.. > > > > > Parjanya Guru > > > +919738723392 > > > Hello, > > I agree Ipomoea nil based on all features especially the sepals > > regards, > > Ron > > P.S. - Some of the wild strains of Ipomoea nil and Ipomoea hederacea > can be extremely difficult to differentiate despite anything posted in > any keys or papers anywhere.. > > > >
