I think the link has not been updated in the website's database, thats why
when you searched for T.involucrata, you got this. So its not your mistake
:).

Regards

----------------------------------------------------
Vijayasankar Raman, Ph.D.
Post Doctoral Research Associate
National Center for Natural Products Research
Thad Cochran Research Center
University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS 38677
Phone: +1 662 915 1018


On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ahh, I am sorry I didnt notice it :(.
>
> Yes this is not the type for involucrata ..
> Thanks for clarification Vijay.
> My apologies for wrong posting too.
> Pankaj
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Vijayasankar <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Pankaj, pl see the herbarium specimen has already been correctly
> > determined as Tragia cannabina which is now T. plukenetii.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> > Vijayasankar Raman, Ph.D.
> > Post Doctoral Research Associate
> > National Center for Natural Products Research
> > Thad Cochran Research Center
> > University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS 38677
> > Phone: +1 662 915 1018
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 3:54 AM, Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On second thought, I just realised, that the plant on sheet is
> different.
> >> Can anyone through some light?
> >> Protologue says pinnatifid.
> >> Regards
> >> Pankaj
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Tragia involucrata L. Sp. Pl. 2: 980. 1753
> >> >
> >> > Type: LINN 1103.8  (Herb Linn)
> >> > This should be designated as type as till now type has not been
> >> > designated for this taxa.
> >> > Pankaj
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:45 PM, raghu ananth <[email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> This green grass the lad is carrying in gunny bags for the livestock,
> >> >> is cut
> >> >> & brought from the cauvery river banks which is about 4 kms away.
> >> >> From my photo archive - dated 16 May 2010
> >> >> Chandagal, Mysore district
> >> >> Regards
> >> >> Raghu
> >> >> Nov 2010
> >> >> Chennai
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > ***********************************************
> >> > "TAXONOMISTS GETTING EXTINCT AND SPECIES DATA DEFICIENT !!"
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Pankaj Kumar Ph.D. (Orchidaceae)
> >> > Research Associate
> >> > Greater Kailash Sacred Landscape Project
> >> > Department of Habitat Ecology
> >> > Wildlife Institute of India
> >> > Post Box # 18
> >> > Dehradun - 248001, India
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> ***********************************************
> >> "TAXONOMISTS GETTING EXTINCT AND SPECIES DATA DEFICIENT !!"
> >>
> >>
> >> Pankaj Kumar Ph.D. (Orchidaceae)
> >> Research Associate
> >> Greater Kailash Sacred Landscape Project
> >> Department of Habitat Ecology
> >> Wildlife Institute of India
> >> Post Box # 18
> >> Dehradun - 248001, India
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>  ***********************************************
> "TAXONOMISTS GETTING EXTINCT AND SPECIES DATA DEFICIENT !!"
>
>
> Pankaj Kumar Ph.D. (Orchidaceae)
> Research Associate
> Greater Kailash Sacred Landscape Project
> Department of Habitat Ecology
> Wildlife Institute of India
> Post Box # 18
> Dehradun - 248001, India
>

Reply via email to