It is Quisqualis indica .   Very common creeper in Chennai , grows
wild.

On Dec 17, 4:40 am, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> To me Pankaj seems right. It is Quisqualis indica (I could not find the
> source which treats Combretum indicum as accepted name). The key in Flora of
> China differentiates the two species as:
>
> 1a. Calyx tube 5–9 cm; petals 10–24 mm, opening white, later turning
> yellowish abaxially and reddish adaxially;
> inflorescence lax; petiole without an inflated joint near base
> ...........................................................................................
>  1. Q. indica
> 1b. Calyx tube 1.7–2.4 cm; petals ca. 3.5 mm, opening dark red or reddish;
> inflorescence dense; petiole with an inflated
> joint near base
> .................................................................................................................................................................
>  2. Q. conferta
>
> According to Flora of China Q. densiflora Wall ex Miq. is the synonym of Q.
> conferta (Jacq.)Excell.
>
> The calyx tube (hypanthium) in above photographs is clearly much longer, and
> at least one flower with white petals can be seen, in others, the outer side
> of petals is much lighter as in Q. indica.
>
> --
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Retired  Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:39 AM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise please.
>
> > Some earlier relevant feedback:
>
> > “what is the difference between Quisqualis indica and densiflora ?” from
> > Vijayadas ji.
>
> > “What I can make out is that Q. indica is more vigorous climber, with
> > larger flowers (7cm as against 5 cm of Q. Densiflora). Then densiflora is
> > more in the nature of clusters.
> > Experts may opine.
> > ak”
>
> > “I think densiflora name itself suggest thick or dense cluster oif flowers.
> > Madhuri”
>
> > "Ok I will ask one question?
> > HOW DENSE IS THE DENSIFLORA :P
> > Names are often kept in comparison with some other allied species,
> > hence it creates confusion!!!
> > To me this plant looks like Combretum indicum, which is the accepted
> > name for Quisqualis indica. But yes, I dont know much about
> > densiflora!!
> > Regards
> > Pankaj"
>
> > "Dense    as compared to Q. indica.
> > ak"
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Anand Kumar Bhatt <[email protected]>
> > Date: 7 November 2010 12:59
> > Subject: [efloraofindia:53546] Quisqualis densiflora
> > To: indiantreepix <[email protected]>
>
> > A native creeper. Favourite of people in UP-Bihar-Bengal where it is known
> > as Madhumalati. Fragrant flowers. At   my place in Gwalior. Today.
> > ak
>
> > --
> > Anand Kumar Bhatt
> > A-59, B.S.F.Colony, Airport Road
> > Gwalior. 474 005.
> > Tele: 0751-247 2233. Mobile 0 94253 09780.
> > My blogsite is at:
> >http://anandkbhatt.blogspot.com
> > (A NEW BLOG HAS BEEN ADDED ON 3 SEPT 2010.)
> > And the photo site:
> >www.flickr.com/photos/akbhatt/
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > Ten most  common surnames of Indians: Singh, Kumar, Sharma, Patel, Shah,
> > Lal, Gupta, Bhat, Rao, Reddy. Cheers!
>
> > --
> > With regards,
> > J.M.Garg ([email protected])
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1
> > 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
> > The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a *thousand species* &
> > eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged
> > alphabetically & place-wise):
> >http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg. You can also use them
> > for free as per liberal licensing conditions attached with each image.
> > For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora,
> > please visit/ join our Google e-group- Efloraofindia:
> >http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix(more than 1460 members &
> > 55,000 messages on 29/11/10 & with a database of around 4300 species on
> > 31/10/10)

Reply via email to