On Mar 29, 12:06 pm, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> Resurfacing again for ID
>
> Earlier feedback
>
> Pardeshi ji.....................................................CAN we have
> pic of fruit? . that may help in identification.
>
> --
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Retired Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Satish Nikam <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 5:16 PM
> Subject: [efloraofindia:64015] identification no020311sn2
> To: Indiantrees Pics <[email protected]>
>
> Dear all,
> Sorry to remind again,but I have not recieved confirmed id. for
> my earlier query.repeating again.photo taken at mulshi punefeb11
> thanks
> regards
> satish nikam
>
>
>
> IMG_4186-r.JPG
> 56KViewDownload
>
> IMG_4190-r.JPG
> 49KViewDownload
>
> IMG_4215-r.JPG
> 47KViewDownload
Hello,
This thread is a duplication of another thread on which I
replied here
http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix/browse_thread/thread/c4fbe5dd6ea71453/59bd350dc07f1612?hl=en
Sometimes the limited information available in the photos posted is
insufficient to make a verified confirmed IDentification.
There are species which are relatively easy to identify with certainty
and then there are species where some very specific information must
be available in order to achieve a definitive ID.
Ipomoea triloba is extremely closely related to Ipomoea trifida and
unless exact measurements of the flower width, flower tube and
measurements of the length of the stamens and pistil are taken and
made available , the best that can be arrived at from a given set of
photos is an intelligent guesstimate.
Taxonomy and 'crystal gazing' are different fields...and I doubt any
of us has a magic crystal ball to obtain scientific results...
regards,
Ron
